-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RFC-003: skip values #218
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
RFC-003: skip values #218
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #218 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 97.65% 97.62% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 32 32
Lines 1618 1601 -17
==========================================
- Hits 1580 1563 -17
Misses 38 38 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
A key question to consider is whether the concept of skip value conditions accounts for all | ||
possible scenarios. Do we need more complex rules that evaluate multiple attributes | ||
simultaneously? For example, should an `ADDRESS` of "123 Main St" be skipped only if the | ||
`ZIP` is also "99999"? While supporting rules of this complexity wouldn't require | ||
significant changes to the specification, it would increase the implementation complexity. | ||
We recommend pursuing this type of **and** logic only if there is a clear and specific need | ||
for it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does NBS have skip values? I imagine theirs would give us insight into how complex the skip rules might be.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Its a good thought, I brought it up with their team today. I believe the answer is no, but they'll get back to us on this.
Description
A proposal to introduce system changes allowing users to define skip conditions for placeholder values to be ignored during the linkage process.
Related Issues
closes #215
<--------------------- REMOVE THE LINES BELOW BEFORE MERGING --------------------->
Checklist
Please review and complete the following checklist before submitting your pull request:
Checklist for Reviewers
Please review and complete the following checklist during the review process: