Skip to content

Conversation

spboyer
Copy link

@spboyer spboyer commented Apr 7, 2025

Refactor the integration of Azure Functions and improve the project structure. Update the Dockerfile for Python 3.10, enhance the development environment, and expand the README with installation and security practices. Implement logging in function handlers, add new API routes, and update Bicep templates for better resource management. Introduce a security scan workflow and add a Code of Conduct and Security Policy. Update dependencies for better management.

spboyer added 2 commits April 7, 2025 18:30
- Updated Dockerfile to use Python 3.10 and install Azure Functions Core Tools.
- Modified devcontainer.json for improved development environment setup.
- Expanded .funcignore to exclude additional files and directories.
- Enhanced README.md with detailed features, installation instructions, and security practices.
- Implemented logging in function handlers and added new API routes.
- Updated Bicep templates for better resource management and diagnostics.
- Added security scan workflow for automated vulnerability checks.
- Introduced Code of Conduct and Security Policy documents.
- Updated requirements.txt with specific package versions for better dependency management.
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

4 similar comments
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

Comment on lines +14 to +15
permissions:
actions: read

Check failure

Code scanning / checkov

Ensure top-level permissions are not set to write-all Error

Ensure top-level permissions are not set to write-all
@paulyuk
Copy link

paulyuk commented Jul 14, 2025

I like what this PR is aiming to do, but I'd ask we collab on a few implementation details:

@spboyer and @pamelafox could we collab and merge a rev of this with the points above handled?

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
{
"name": "FastAPI on Azure Functions",
"name": "Python FastAPI Function",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the original title was more specific/cleaer

]
}
},
"postCreateCommand": "python3 -m venv .venv",
"postCreateCommand": "pip install -r requirements.txt",
"postAttachCommand": ". .venv/bin/activate",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems weird that postAttachCommand activates venv, but postCreate no longer makes it? I think that's wrong. postCreate should still make it?

### Prerequisites
- Python 3.9 or later
- Azure Functions Core Tools
- Azure CLI
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Azure CLI? Shouldnt it be azd? Or does it need both?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it should be azd only

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
from fastapi import FastAPI

app = FastAPI()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this file used?

@paulyuk
Copy link

paulyuk commented Jul 14, 2025

@copilot please address my comments and Pamelafox's

@paulyuk paulyuk requested a review from Copilot July 14, 2025 20:40
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

Refactors Azure Functions integration with FastAPI, enhances infrastructure templates, updates the development container, and expands project documentation and security practices.

  • Reworked function_app entrypoint using FunctionApp and ASGI middleware, removed previous wrapper approach
  • Parameterized and improved Bicep templates (resource group logic, tags, role assignment, outputs)
  • Updated devcontainer Dockerfile to Python 3.10, added security scan workflow, and expanded README/SECURITY docs

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 22 out of 24 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
startup.py Added simple FastAPI test route
infra/main.bicep Parameterized resource group, tags, module renames, outputs
infra/core/storage/storage-account.bicep Added new storage account parameters and updated resource blocks
infra/core/host/functions.bicep Enabled managed identity, skip role assignment logic, added roleAssignment
infra/core/host/appservice.bicep Unified tags with azd-service-name
host.json Expanded logging config, bumped extensionBundle version, set timeout
function_app.py Defined FastAPI routes, created FunctionApp, applied ASGI middleware
SECURITY.md Added security policy template
README.md Expanded installation instructions, features, and security notice
.devcontainer/Dockerfile Switched base image to Python 3.10, venv creation, updated tools
.github/workflows/security-scan.yml Introduced weekly security scan workflow
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)

SECURITY.md:8

  • Replace the placeholder '[SECURITY CONTACT EMAIL]' with an actual security contact email address.
2. Send details of the vulnerability to [SECURITY CONTACT EMAIL].

README.md:91

  • [nitpick] There's a second '## Prerequisites' section here. Consider consolidating duplicate sections to improve the README's clarity.
## Prerequisites

infra/main.bicep:18

  • Using uniqueString(name) reduces the uniqueness domain compared to the original uniqueString(subscription().id, name, location), which may cause name collisions across subscriptions or regions. Consider reverting to the original inputs for collision safety.
var prefix = '${name}-${uniqueString(name)}'

@@ -2,86 +2,111 @@ targetScope = 'subscription'

@minLength(1)
@maxLength(64)
@description('Name which is used to generate a short unique hash for each resource')
@description('Name of the the environment which is used to generate a short unique hash used in all resources.')
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Jul 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Duplicate word 'the the' in the description. It should read 'Name of the environment which is used to generate a short unique hash used in all resources.'

Suggested change
@description('Name of the the environment which is used to generate a short unique hash used in all resources.')
@description('Name of the environment which is used to generate a short unique hash used in all resources.')

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ param tags object = {}
param applicationInsightsName string = ''
param appServicePlanId string
param keyVaultName string = ''
param managedIdentity bool = !empty(keyVaultName)
param managedIdentity bool = true // Always enable managed identity
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Jul 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nitpick] The managedIdentity parameter is now always true and no longer drives any conditional logic. It can be removed to simplify this template.

Suggested change
param managedIdentity bool = true // Always enable managed identity

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Comment on lines +1 to +7
from fastapi import FastAPI

app = FastAPI()

@app.get("/api/test")
async def test():
return {"message": "FastAPI on Azure Functions"}
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Jul 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nitpick] startup.py defines a FastAPI app that isn't referenced by the current function.json bindings. Consider removing or consolidating it with function_app.py to avoid dead code.

Suggested change
from fastapi import FastAPI
app = FastAPI()
@app.get("/api/test")
async def test():
return {"message": "FastAPI on Azure Functions"}
# Removed unused FastAPI app and route definition as it is not referenced elsewhere.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Copy link

@paulyuk paulyuk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please see comments and resolve.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure this should be included.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should not be needed in pythonv2 model.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do not include this. We should use Pythonv2 programming model


## Costs
The main cost components for this solution are:
- Azure Functions consumption plan (pay-per-execution)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- Azure Functions consumption plan (pay-per-execution)
- Azure Functions Flex Consumption plan (pay-per-execution)

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

File not needed in Python v2

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

File not needed in Python v2

import azure.functions as func
from fastapi import FastAPI
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need to add extension per doc

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Really all of this bicep should be replaced by the newer AVM based version here:
https://github.com/Azure-Samples/functions-quickstart-python-http-azd/tree/main/infra

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants