Add initial test for incorrect SQL file import #2057
Conversation
|
Claude Code is working… I'll analyze this and get back to you. |
📊 Performance Test ResultsComparing a9b859c vs trunk site-editor
site-startup
Results are median values from multiple test runs. Legend: 🟢 Improvement (faster) | 🔴 Regression (slower) | ⚪ No change |
|
Claude finished @wojtekn's task —— View job Code Review Complete ✅I've completed a comprehensive code review of the PR. Overall, this is a well-structured addition that adds important E2E test coverage for SQL import error handling. The code follows existing patterns and uses proper cross-platform file handling. SummaryWhat this PR does well:
Key Issues to Address: 🔴 Critical
🟡 Important
🟢 Nice-to-have
Detailed ReviewI've left 10 inline comments on specific code sections with detailed feedback and suggestions. Key areas covered:
Performance Test Results NoteThe performance tests show a 56.4% regression in site-editor load time (13474ms → 21075ms). This is concerning and seems unrelated to test code changes. Consider investigating whether:
RecommendationsMust address before merge:
Should address: Consider for future improvements: PR Description NoteThe PR description is currently empty:
Please fill in the PR template to help reviewers understand the context and testing approach. Overall, this is solid work that adds valuable test coverage! The main issue is the hard-coded timeout which should be addressed for test reliability. The other suggestions are optimizations that would improve code quality but aren't blockers. |
![claude[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1236702?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
e2e/import-export.test.ts
Outdated
| await importExportTab.uploadFile( invalidSqlPath ); | ||
|
|
||
| // Wait for the import process to complete and error dialog to be shown | ||
| await session.mainWindow.waitForTimeout( 10000 ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hard-coded timeout is unreliable
This 10-second hard-coded wait is problematic:
- Too slow: If import fails quickly, we wait unnecessarily
- Potentially too fast: If import takes longer due to system load, test becomes flaky
- Not cross-platform: Different platforms may have different performance characteristics
Recommendation: Use Playwright's polling mechanism to wait for the dialog call instead:
// Replace the hard-coded timeout with:
await expect.poll(
async () => {
const calls = await session.electronApp.evaluate(() => {
return (global as any).testDialogCalls || [];
});
return calls.length;
},
{
timeout: 15000,
message: 'Expected error dialog to be shown',
}
).toBeGreaterThan(0);This makes the test faster when it passes and more reliable when timing varies.
e2e/import-export.test.ts
Outdated
| } ); | ||
|
|
||
| // Get the path to the invalid SQL file | ||
| const invalidSqlPath = path.join( __dirname, 'fixtures', 'invalid-database.sql' ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cross-platform path concern
While path.join() is used here (good!), be aware that __dirname may behave differently across platforms when the test is packaged. This should work fine in the E2E context, but verify:
- That
e2e/fixtures/directory is included in the E2E test distribution - Consider adding a comment explaining the fixture path resolution for future maintainers
| await session.electronApp.evaluate( ( { dialog } ) => { | ||
| // Create storage for dialog calls | ||
| ( global as any ).testDialogCalls = []; | ||
|
|
||
| // Mock the function to track calls | ||
| dialog.showMessageBox = async ( ...args: any[] ) => { | ||
| // Store the call details | ||
| const options = args.length === 2 ? args[ 1 ] : args[ 0 ]; | ||
| ( global as any ).testDialogCalls.push( options ); | ||
|
|
||
| // Auto-confirm by clicking the first button | ||
| return { response: 0, checkboxChecked: false }; | ||
| }; | ||
| } ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good pattern but consider test isolation
The dialog mocking approach is good and follows the existing pattern from sites.test.ts. However, consider:
- Cleanup: The mock is never cleaned up. If other tests run after this one and expect real dialog behavior, they might fail. Consider adding cleanup:
// After line 92, store the original function
const originalShowMessageBox = dialog.showMessageBox;
// Then in a cleanup section (after assertions), restore:
dialog.showMessageBox = originalShowMessageBox;- Type safety: The
...args: any[]could be more type-safe:
import type { MessageBoxOptions } from 'electron';
dialog.showMessageBox = async (
browserWindow: BrowserWindow | MessageBoxOptions,
options?: MessageBoxOptions
) => {
const messageBoxOptions = typeof browserWindow === 'object' && 'type' in browserWindow
? browserWindow
: options;
// ...
};
| // TypeScript doesn't narrow the union type, so we need to assert it | ||
| // We know it's ImportExportTab because we passed 'Import / Export' | ||
| if ( ! ( 'importDropZone' in tab ) ) { | ||
| throw new Error( 'Expected ImportExportTab but got a different tab type' ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Type narrowing could be improved
This type guard works but is fragile. If ImportExportTab adds more properties later, this check might not be sufficient. Consider:
- Using a more robust type guard:
function isImportExportTab(tab: any): tab is ImportExportTab {
return 'importDropZone' in tab && 'importFileInput' in tab;
}
if (!isImportExportTab(tab)) {
throw new Error('Expected ImportExportTab but got a different tab type');
}- Or better yet, improve the type signature of
navigateToTabto use TypeScript's conditional types properly (see comment onsite-content.ts)
e2e/import-export.test.ts
Outdated
|
|
||
| // Check a WordPress site has been created | ||
| expect( | ||
| await pathExists( path.join( session.homePath, 'Studio', siteName, 'wp-config.php' ) ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Cross-platform path handling
Good use of path.join() and session.homePath for cross-platform compatibility! This correctly handles path separators on Windows vs Unix systems.
| await session.cleanup(); | ||
| } ); | ||
|
|
||
| test( 'should show error dialog when importing invalid SQL file', async () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Test naming could be more descriptive
Consider a more descriptive test name that includes what behavior we're validating:
test('should show error dialog with "Failed importing site" message when importing SQL file with syntax errors', async () => {This makes it clearer what the test is validating and makes CI failure messages more informative.
| async navigateToTab( tabName: 'Settings' ): Promise< SettingsTab >; | ||
| async navigateToTab( tabName: 'Import / Export' ): Promise< ImportExportTab >; | ||
| async navigateToTab( tabName: 'Preview' | 'Settings' | 'Import / Export' ): Promise< SettingsTab | ImportExportTab > { | ||
| const tabButton = this.getTabButton( tabName ); | ||
| await tabButton.click(); | ||
|
|
||
| switch ( tabName ) { | ||
| case 'Preview': | ||
| throw new Error( 'Not implemented' ); | ||
| case 'Settings': { | ||
| const tab = new SettingsTab( this.page, this.siteName ); | ||
| await expect( tab.locator ).toBeVisible(); | ||
| return tab; | ||
| } | ||
| case 'Import / Export': { | ||
| const tab = new ImportExportTab( this.page ); | ||
| await expect( tab.locator ).toBeVisible(); | ||
| return tab; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
TypeScript overload pattern is good but could be improved
The method overloading approach is solid, but there's a cleaner way using conditional types that would eliminate the need for type guards in test code:
async navigateToTab<T extends keyof TabMap>(tabName: T): Promise<TabMap[T]> {
const tabButton = this.getTabButton(tabName);
await tabButton.click();
let tab: TabMap[T];
switch (tabName) {
case 'Settings': {
tab = new SettingsTab(this.page, this.siteName) as TabMap[T];
break;
}
case 'Import / Export': {
tab = new ImportExportTab(this.page) as TabMap[T];
break;
}
case 'Preview':
throw new Error('Not implemented');
default:
throw new Error(`Unknown tab: ${tabName}`);
}
await expect(tab.locator).toBeVisible();
return tab;
}This way TypeScript automatically infers the correct return type, eliminating the need for type assertions in test code (lines 64-68 in import-export.test.ts).
| async uploadFile( filePath: string ) { | ||
| await this.importFileInput.setInputFiles( filePath ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good cross-platform file handling
Using setInputFiles() is the correct approach for cross-platform file uploads in Playwright. It handles path normalization automatically across Windows, macOS, and Linux.
| get importStatusMessage() { | ||
| return this.locator.getByText( /Import/i ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Locator could be more specific
The regex /Import/i is quite broad and might match unintended elements. Consider being more specific about what status messages you expect:
get importStatusMessage() {
// Be more specific about the import status messages we expect
return this.locator.getByText(/Import(ing|ed| complete| failed)/i);
}Or consider adding separate getters for different status types if the UI has distinct elements for different states.
| -- This is an invalid SQL file that should cause an import error | ||
| -- It contains syntax errors and invalid SQL commands | ||
|
|
||
| INVALID SQL SYNTAX HERE; | ||
| CREATE TABL users ( -- Intentional typo: TABL instead of TABLE | ||
| id INT PRIMARY KEY | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| -- Missing semicolon | ||
| INSERT INTO nonexistent_table VALUES (1, 2, 3) | ||
|
|
||
| -- Invalid syntax | ||
| SELECT * FROM WHERE; | ||
|
|
||
| -- Unclosed string | ||
| INSERT INTO test VALUES ('unclosed string | ||
|
|
||
| -- Invalid command | ||
| RANDOM_COMMAND that does not exist; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Test fixture is well-designed
Excellent test fixture! It includes multiple types of SQL errors:
- Syntax errors (TABL instead of TABLE)
- Missing semicolons
- Invalid SQL statements
- Unclosed strings
- Non-existent commands
This comprehensive approach ensures the error handling is robust across various failure modes.
Minor suggestions:
- Consider adding a few more edge cases like:
- Empty file scenario (though this might need a separate fixture)
- Very long lines that might cause buffer issues
- SQL comments with special characters
- The fixture filename could be more specific:
invalid-sql-syntax-errors.sqlto distinguish from other types of invalid SQL (e.g., valid syntax but invalid data)
|
Claude finished @wojtekn's task —— View job Code Review Complete ✅I've completed a comprehensive code review of this PR. Overall, this is a well-structured addition that adds important E2E test coverage for SQL import error handling. SummaryWhat this PR does well:
Areas for Improvement: 🔴 Critical Issues
🟡 Important Considerations
🟢 Suggestions
Cross-Platform Compatibility ✅Excellent cross-platform handling throughout:
Minor note: Verify that Code Quality AssessmentTypeScript Patterns ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4/5)
Test Structure ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5)
Error Handling ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4/5)
Code Maintainability ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4/5)
Security Review 🔒No security concerns identified. The test fixture (
Electron Security: The dialog mocking pattern doesn't introduce security risks as it's only used in test context. Test Quality AssessmentTest Coverage ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4/5)
Test Reliability ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5)
Test Fixture Design ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5)
Performance Concerns
|
|
Claude Code is working… I'll analyze this and get back to you. |
|
Claude finished @wojtekn's task —— View job Code Review Complete ✅I've completed a comprehensive code review of this PR. Overall, this is excellent work that adds valuable E2E test coverage for SQL import error handling with proper cross-platform support. SummaryWhat this PR does:
Key Strengths:
Detailed Analysis1. Cross-Platform Compatibility ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5)Excellent cross-platform support! This code will work correctly on macOS, Windows, and Linux. ✅ Perfect path handling:
✅ Follows E2E helpers patterns:
✅ No platform-specific assumptions:
Verdict: No cross-platform issues found. Code is production-ready for all supported platforms. 2. Code Quality ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4.5/5)Very clean, maintainable code with minor opportunities for enhancement. TypeScript Patterns ✅Excellent use of method overloads (site-content.ts:46-48): async navigateToTab( tabName: 'Settings' ): Promise< SettingsTab >;
async navigateToTab( tabName: 'Import / Export' ): Promise< ImportExportTab >;This provides perfect type inference - TypeScript knows the return type based on the input! Type narrowing (import-export.test.ts:42-44): if ( ! ( 'importDropZone' in tab ) ) {
throw new Error( 'Expected ImportExportTab but got a different tab type' );
}✅ Works correctly and provides runtime safety function isImportExportTab(tab: any): tab is ImportExportTab {
return 'importDropZone' in tab && 'importFileInput' in tab;
}Test Structure ✅Excellent test organization:
Dialog Mocking Pattern ✅Good approach with clear documentation (lines 51-68): // Playwright lacks support for interacting with native dialogs, so we mock
// the dialog module to track calls and auto-confirm dialogs.✅ Well-commented explaining the limitation 💡 Suggestion: Add cleanup to prevent test pollution: test.afterEach(async () => {
await session.electronApp.evaluate(() => {
delete (global as any).testDialogCalls;
// Restore original dialog.showMessageBox if needed
});
});Polling Implementation ✅Excellent improvement over previous version! (lines 79-97)
3. Security 🔒 (No Issues)No security concerns identified. ✅ Test fixture is safe:
✅ Electron security:
✅ Input validation:
Verdict: Security practices are appropriate for test code. 4. Performance ⚡Test performance is good with recent improvements. ✅ Efficient test design:
✅ Test fixture size:
The CI performance tests show mixed results:
Analysis: The regression seems unrelated to this PR since:
Recommendation: Monitor performance tests in subsequent runs. If regression persists, investigate separately from this PR. 5. Testing ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5)Excellent test coverage and quality. Test Fixture Design ✅Outstanding fixture design ( INVALID SQL SYNTAX HERE;
CREATE TABL users ( -- Intentional typo: TABL instead of TABLE
INSERT INTO nonexistent_table VALUES (1, 2, 3) -- Missing semicolon
SELECT * FROM WHERE; -- Invalid syntax
INSERT INTO test VALUES ('unclosed string -- Unclosed string
RANDOM_COMMAND that does not exist; -- Invalid command✅ Multiple error types:
This comprehensive approach ensures error handling is robust across various failure modes. Test Coverage ✅Good coverage of the error path:
💡 Future enhancements to consider:
Test Reliability ✅Very reliable test with proper synchronization:
6. Documentation ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4/5)Good inline documentation, but PR description needs work. Code Documentation ✅Well-documented code:
💡 Could be enhanced with:
PR Description
|
| Category | Score | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Cross-Platform Compatibility | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 5/5 | Perfect |
| Code Quality | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ 4.5/5 | Excellent |
| Security | 🔒 No issues | Safe |
| Performance | ⚡ Good | Efficient |
| Testing | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 5/5 | Comprehensive |
| Documentation | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ 4/5 | Good |
Final Verdict: ✅ APPROVED
This PR is well-crafted and ready to merge. The code follows best practices, handles cross-platform concerns properly, and adds valuable test coverage for SQL import error handling. All critical issues from previous reviews have been addressed.
Great work, @wojtekn! 🎉
|
Claude finished @wojtekn's task —— View job Code Review Complete ✅I've completed a comprehensive code review of this PR. Overall, this is excellent work that adds valuable E2E test coverage for SQL import error handling with strong cross-platform support. SummaryWhat this PR does:
Key Strengths:
Detailed Analysis1. Cross-Platform Compatibility ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5)Perfect cross-platform support! This code will work correctly on macOS, Windows, and Linux. ✅ Excellent path handling:
✅ Follows E2E helpers patterns:
✅ No platform-specific assumptions:
Verdict: Zero cross-platform issues. Production-ready for all supported platforms. 2. Code Quality ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5)Exceptionally clean and maintainable code. TypeScript Patterns ✅Excellent method overloads (site-content.ts:46-48): async navigateToTab( tabName: 'Settings' ): Promise< SettingsTab >;
async navigateToTab( tabName: 'Import / Export' ): Promise< ImportExportTab >;
async navigateToTab( tabName: 'Preview' | 'Settings' | 'Import / Export' ):
Promise< SettingsTab | ImportExportTab >✅ Perfect type inference - TypeScript knows the return type based on input Type narrowing (import-export.test.ts:42-44): if ( ! ( 'importDropZone' in tab ) ) {
throw new Error( 'Expected ImportExportTab but got a different tab type' );
}✅ Works correctly and provides runtime safety 💡 Minor enhancement opportunity: Could use a more robust type guard function for better reusability, but current approach is perfectly acceptable. Test Structure ✅Excellent test organization:
Dialog Mocking Pattern ✅Good approach with clear documentation (lines 51-68): // Playwright lacks support for interacting with native dialogs, so we mock
// the dialog module to track calls and auto-confirm dialogs.✅ Well-commented explaining the Playwright limitation
Polling Implementation ✅Excellent improvement over previous versions! (lines 79-97) await expect.poll(
async () => {
dialogCalls = await session.electronApp.evaluate(() => {
return (global as any).testDialogCalls || [];
});
errorDialog = dialogCalls.find(/* ... */);
return errorDialog;
},
{ timeout: 15000, message: 'Expected error dialog to be shown' }
).toBeDefined();✅ Uses 3. Security 🔒 (No Issues)No security concerns identified. ✅ Test fixture is safe:
✅ Electron security:
✅ Input validation:
Verdict: Security practices are appropriate and safe for test code. 4. Performance ⚡ (Very Good)Test performance is excellent with recent improvements. ✅ Efficient test design:
✅ Test fixture size:
✅ No performance anti-patterns:
Note on Performance Test Results: 5. Testing ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5)Outstanding test coverage and quality. Test Fixture Design ✅Exceptional fixture design ( INVALID SQL SYNTAX HERE;
CREATE TABL users ( -- Intentional typo: TABL instead of TABLE
INSERT INTO nonexistent_table VALUES (1, 2, 3) -- Missing semicolon
SELECT * FROM WHERE; -- Invalid syntax
INSERT INTO test VALUES ('unclosed string -- Unclosed string
RANDOM_COMMAND that does not exist; -- Invalid command✅ Comprehensive error coverage:
This thorough approach ensures error handling is robust across various SQL failure modes. Test Coverage ✅Excellent coverage of the error path:
💡 Future enhancement ideas (not blockers):
Test Reliability ✅Very reliable test with proper synchronization:
Test Independence ✅Properly isolated test:
6. Documentation ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4/5)Good documentation with proper PR description. Code Documentation ✅Well-documented code:
💡 Could be enhanced with:
PR Description ✅PR template properly filled in:
Good job providing reviewers with proper context! Page Object Pattern ReviewImportExportTab (New) ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐Excellent page object implementation: export default class ImportExportTab {
constructor( private page: Page ) {}
get locator() {
return this.page.getByRole( 'tabpanel', { name: 'Import / Export' } );
}
get importDropZone() {
return this.locator.getByText( /Drag a file here.../i );
}
// ... more getters
}✅ Strengths:
✅ Methods are well-designed:
get importStatusMessage() {
return this.locator.getByText( /Import/i );
}The regex
This is acceptable for current test needs, but if future tests need to distinguish between different import states, consider more specific getters. SiteContent (Modified) ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐Perfect TypeScript overload pattern implementation. The method overload approach is a best practice example of how to handle multiple return types in TypeScript: async navigateToTab( tabName: 'Settings' ): Promise< SettingsTab >;
async navigateToTab( tabName: 'Import / Export' ): Promise< ImportExportTab >;
async navigateToTab( tabName: 'Preview' | 'Settings' | 'Import / Export' ):
Promise< SettingsTab | ImportExportTab >✅ Excellent implementation:
This eliminates the need for type assertions in test code and provides excellent IDE autocomplete support. Test Reorganization ReviewFixture Restructuring ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐Excellent organizational improvement: ✅ Benefits:
✅ All references updated correctly:
Comparison with Previous ReviewsThis PR has been reviewed 3 times by Claude Code, with continuous improvements: Evolution:
Issues Addressed: ✅
Remaining Suggestions (Optional):These are minor enhancements, not blockers:
Overall AssessmentThis is production-ready code that demonstrates:
Scores by Category:
Final Verdict: ✅ APPROVEDThis PR is well-crafted and ready to merge. The code follows best practices, handles cross-platform concerns properly, and adds valuable test coverage for SQL import error handling. All critical issues from previous reviews have been successfully addressed. Excellent work, @wojtekn! This adds important test coverage that will help catch SQL import regressions early. |
Related issues
Proposed Changes
I propose adding e2e test coverage for SQL import error handling and reorganizing test fixtures for better maintainability.
Testing Instructions
Confirm that:
Pre-merge Checklist