Upgrade tree sitter

[neubig]

End-user friendly description of the problem this fixes or functionality that this introduces

• Include this change in the Release Notes. If checked, you must provide an end-user friendly description for your change below

---

Give a summary of what the PR does, explaining any non-trivial design decisions

This PR #5534 may require upgrading tree-sitter, so this PR attempts to upgrade tree sitter. Let's see if tests pass.

CC @kjain14 @enyst

---

To run this PR locally, use the following command:

docker run -it --rm   -p 3000:3000   -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock   --add-host host.docker.internal:host-gateway   -e SANDBOX_RUNTIME_CONTAINER_IMAGE=docker.all-hands.dev/all-hands-ai/runtime:35d12b8-nikolaik   --name openhands-app-35d12b8   docker.all-hands.dev/all-hands-ai/openhands:35d12b8

[enyst]

Ah, the pin comes from aci

openhands-ai-py3.12➜ odie git:(upgrade-tree-sitter) ✗ poetry lock
Resolving dependencies... (0.6s)

Because openhands-aci (0.2.2) depends on tree-sitter (0.21.3)
and no versions of openhands-aci match >0.2.2,<0.3.0, openhands-aci (>=0.2.2,<0.3.0) requires tree-sitter (0.21.3).
So, because openhands-ai depends on both tree-sitter (^0.24.0) and openhands-aci (^0.2.2), version solving failed.

[ryanhoangt]

LGTM! One small nit: I noticed the new lock file was generated using v1.8.4, while the old one used v2.0.x. Should we also regenerate it with v2.0.x for consistency?

[enyst]

LGTM! One small nit: I noticed the new lock file was generated using v1.8.4, while the old one used v2.0.x. Should we also regenerate it with v2.0.x for consistency?

Ah, I've seen this one. Regenerating, thanks!

[enyst]

Let's see it!