New grpGeomRequest for ITS and MFT jsons

[iravasen]

This follows AliceO2Group/QualityControl#2164
and has to go together with it!

Before merge wait approval from MFT colleagues.

[github-actions]

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION RELEASES:
To request your PR to be included in production software, please add the corresponding labels called "async-" to your PR. Add the labels directly (if you have the permissions) or add a comment of the form (note that labels are separated by a ",")

+async-label <label1>, <label2>, !<label3> ...

This will add <label1> and <label2> and removes <label3>.

The following labels are available
async-2022-pp-apass4
async-2023-pbpb-apass
async-2023-pp-apass1
async-data
async-mc
async-2022-pp-apass6

[shahor02]

Thanks @iravasen
Looks fine to me but better MFT experts also check. I've just noticed, that in opposite to the original QualityControl/Modules/MFT/mft-tracks.json the O2DPG/Data/production/qc-async/mft.json was not requesting the GRPGeom block for the MFTTracks task. This means that the call https://github.com/AliceO2Group/QualityControl/blob/55da459a99b14b920255998b1c40148dce48603f/Modules/MFT/src/QcMFTTrackTask.cxx#L211 was returning default 128 orbits / TF

[chiarazampolli]

Hello @iravasen ,
Did you ping the MFT expert? I guess it is Maurice, but I cannot find his github account.

Chiara

[mcoquet642]

Hi, after discussing with the MFT QC team these changes are ok from our side. Do you also plan to modify the config files in consul or should we do it ourselves once we have the new FLPSuite ?

[shahor02]

Thanks @iravasen , @mcoquet642 !
Yes, eventually also the consul should be modified but only once the new QC is bumped and deployed at P2.
Also, this PR fails since it is built against QualityControl/v1.135.1-local2, I guess we should have it on hold until the QC is bumped (pending to @Barthelemy )

[iravasen]

Hi @Barthelemy @shahor02, I guess now this PR can be merged?

[shahor02]

Yes! Once the new QC is deployed at P2, one can change also jsons on consul.

[chiarazampolli]

Hello @iravasen ,

I guess I can merge now. And I also think that this is needed in view of the memory reduction for QC, right?

Chiara

[iravasen]

Yes thanks! Sorry

[chiarazampolli]

Now there are conflicts...