-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 233
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci: coverage #7207
ci: coverage #7207
Conversation
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ |
8df827f
to
c8d97f9
Compare
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #7207 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage ? 79.40%
=========================================
Files ? 390
Lines ? 73957
Branches ? 3
=========================================
Hits ? 58725
Misses ? 15231
Partials ? 1 |
59ca202
to
afdea6a
Compare
afdea6a
to
c08464a
Compare
c08464a
to
800f196
Compare
I suspect this won't be worth pursuing until, My understanding of the current state: #1664 (comment) |
01a6812
to
c52338e
Compare
f1747a4
to
c6508ad
Compare
Curious about your thoughts @turadg - this basically productionizes diffs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice! It's going to miss what's in Endo bundles but it does tell us a lower bound of coverage.
I support landing this to master so we can start seeing what value is has when reviewing a diff.
c6508ad
to
84335e9
Compare
Adds coverage reporting and codecov.io report uploading to CI