Skip to content

feat: wagmi and viem v1 #448

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 87 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: wagmi and viem v1 #448

wants to merge 87 commits into from

Conversation

brucedonovan
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 14, 2023

Deploy Preview for ironclad-parent ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 230d31b
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/ironclad-parent/deploys/65143de98152e3000807960f
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-448--ironclad-parent.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@marcomariscal
Copy link
Contributor

marcomariscal commented Sep 21, 2023

Further testing needed for each component.

Is manual testing completed by widget:

  • 4626
  • dsr
  • frax staking
  • hop bridging
  • lido deposit
  • liquity borrow (not integrated into backend yet)
  • liquity close (not integrated into backend yet)
  • buy nft
  • nft asset
  • nft asset list
  • nft collection
  • rocket pool deposit
  • rocket pool withdraw
  • transfer
  • tx replay
  • uniswap
  • weth (not on BE?)
  • yield borrow
  • yield close
  • yield lend
  • yield close
  • zksync deposit
  • zksync withdraw

@marcomariscal marcomariscal changed the title Feat/new wagmi viem feat: wagmi and viem v1 Sep 21, 2023
@brucedonovan brucedonovan marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2023 11:00
Copy link
Contributor

@marcomariscal marcomariscal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approving, knowing that a few of the widgets need more stability (separate context from this pr)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants