Pydanticforms: Migrate all existing SURF workflows

[DutchBen]

Epic Ticket to migrate all existing SURF workflows.

This ticket depends on 2 things.

• Pydanticforms: add fieldComponent override to wfo provider #1831 Will add a pydantic forms component override to be passed into the wfo app to handle custom fields workflows may provide
• Pydanticforms: Create /workflow/new page with WfoStartProcessPage override #1905 Will create a custom surf /workflows/new/ page. We can do this by overriding the WfoStartProcessPage component from the ui library. This component contains a switch statement that uses processName to determine if a workflow should use pydantic forms or uniforms

(processName === 'modify_note' && (
                        <WfoPydanticForm
                            processName={processName}
                            startProcessPayload={startProcessPayload}
                            isTask={isTask}
                        />
                    )) ||

By overriding this component we can migrate workflows one by one by adding them to this condition without polluting the opensource library. This override will be in the surf version only

This is the list of all workflows is the return value of this query

    query Workflows {
        workflows(first: 1000000, after: 0, filterBy: [{ field: "target", value: "create|modify|system|terminate"}]) {
            page {
                name
            }
        }
    }

The goals is to add these workflows to the switch condition one by one and add fields that are not implemented. This way we will be exposed to all fields that are needed and end up with a feature complete set.

no	Workflow name	Fields	Claimer	Status or ticket
1	create_core_link
2	create_fw
3	create_ip_lir_prefix
4	create_ip_peer
5	create_ip_peer_group
6	create_ip_peer_port
7	create_ip_sub_prefix
8	create_node		Ruben	Productie
9	create_nsi_light_path
10	create_nsistp
11	create_optical_service
12	create_qci_kms_link
13	create_qci_kms_node
14	create_qci_qkd_service
15	create_qci_qkm
16	create_qci_qkm_link
17	create_sn8_aggregated_service_port
18	create_sn8_ip_bgp
19	create_sn8_ip_static
20	create_sn8_irb_service_port
21	create_sn8_l2vpn
22	create_sn8_l3vpn
23	create_sn8_light_path
24	create_sn8_msc
25	create_sn8_service_port		Ruben	Review
26	create_surf_wireless
27	modify_core_link_add_link
28	modify_core_link_isis_metric
29	modify_core_link_maintenance
30	modify_core_link_modify_link
31	modify_core_link_remove_link
32	modify_fw
33	modify_fw_speed
34	modify_ip_lir_prefix
35	modify_ip_peer
36	modify_ip_peer_group
37	modify_ip_peer_port
38	modify_ip_sub_prefix
39	modify_node
40	modify_node_in_service
41	modify_note		Ruben	Productie
42	modify_nsi_light_path
43	modify_nsistp
44	modify_optical_service
45	modify_sn8_aggregated_service_port
46	modify_sn8_aggregated_service_port_move
47	modify_sn8_ip_bgp
48	modify_sn8_ip_bgp_change_port
49	modify_sn8_ip_static		Ruben	#1954
50	modify_sn8_l2vpn
51	modify_sn8_l3vpn
52	modify_sn8_light_path
53	modify_sn8_light_path_downgrade_from_redundant
54	modify_sn8_light_path_redundant
55	modify_sn8_light_path_upgrade_to_redundant
56	modify_sn8_msc
57	modify_sn8_service_port
58	modify_sn8_service_port_move
59	modify_sn8_service_port_port_mode
60	modify_subscription_references
61	modify_surf_wireless
62	redeploy_ims_circuit	subscription_id dropdown
63	resend_email	email select dropdown
64	reset_subscription_description	subscription_id dropdown
65	task_cache_warmer	NA
66	task_clean_up_tasks	NA	Ruben
67	task_delete_orphaned_ims_contacts	NA
68	task_export_subscriptions_by_customer	couple of fields
69	task_export_subscriptions_by_node	couple of fields
70	task_export_surf_network_usage	mainly checkboxes
71	task_fix_ims_customer_organisation_uuids	NA
72	task_import_crm_customers	NA
73	task_import_crm_data_to_ims	NA
74	task_publish_subscriptions_to_kafka	Checkbox
75	task_push_customers_to_kafka	NA
76	task_resume_workflows	NA	Ruben
77	task_update_surf_net_txt_record	Integer field
78	task_validate_corelink_ptp_prefix_records	NA
79	task_validate_crm_locations	NA
80	task_validate_customer_ip_prefix_records	NA
81	task_validate_nso_against_subscriptions	NA
82	task_validate_product_type	Product type dropdown
83	task_validate_products	NA	Ruben
84	task_validate_ptp_prefix_records	NA
85	terminate_core_link	Customer Contact
86	terminate_fw	Customer Contact
87	terminate_ip_lir_prefix	Customer Contact
88	terminate_ip_peer	Customer Contact
89	terminate_ip_peer_group	Customer Contact
90	terminate_ip_peer_port	Customer Contact
91	terminate_ip_sub_prefix	Customer Contact
92	terminate_node	Customer Contact	Georgi	Done
93	terminate_nsi_light_path	Customer Contact
94	terminate_nsistp	Customer Contact
95	terminate_optical_service	Customer Contact
96	terminate_qci_kms_link	Customer Contact
97	terminate_qci_kms_node	Customer Contact
98	terminate_qci_qkd_service	Customer Contact
99	terminate_qci_qkm	Customer Contact
100	terminate_qci_qkm_link	Customer Contact
101	terminate_sn8_aggregated_service_port	Customer Contact
102	terminate_sn8_ip_bgp	Customer Contact	Georgi	Done
103	terminate_sn8_ip_static	Customer Contact	Georgi	Done
104	terminate_sn8_irb_service_port	Customer Contact
105	terminate_sn8_l2vpn	Customer Contact
106	terminate_sn8_l3vpn	Customer Contact
107	terminate_sn8_light_path	Customer Contact
108	terminate_sn8_msc	Customer Contact	Georgi	Done
109	terminate_sn8_service_port	Customer Contact	Georgi	Done
110	terminate_surf_wireless	Customer Contact
111	validate_core_link	NA
112	validate_fw	NA
113	validate_ip_lir_prefix	NA
114	validate_ip_peer	NA
115	validate_ip_peer_group	NA
116	validate_ip_peer_port	NA
117	validate_ip_sub_prefix	NA
118	validate_node	NA
119	validate_nsi_light_path	NA
120	validate_nsistp	NA
121	validate_optical_service	NA
122	validate_sn8_aggregated_service_port	NA
123	validate_sn8_ip_bgp	NA
124	validate_sn8_ip_static	NA
125	validate_sn8_irb_service_port	NA
126	validate_sn8_l2vpn	NA
127	validate_sn8_l3vpn	NA
128	validate_sn8_light_path	NA
129	validate_sn8_light_path_redundant	NA
130	validate_sn8_msc	NA
131	validate_sn8_service_port	NA
132	validate_surf_wireless	NA

[DutchBen]

Suggestion from @Mark90 to use a dateTime field for date field instead of a timestamp field. This would mean we receive a date time instead of a timestamp from the backend. Keep this in mind when working on this field.

[Mark90]

Suggestion from @Mark90 to use a dateTime field for date field instead of a timestamp field. This would mean we receive a date time instead of a timestamp from the backend. Keep this in mind when working on this field.

workfloworchestrator/pydantic-forms#46