Definitions that link to WCAG Understanding docs are either going to wrong version of WCAG (2.1) or have a broken link

[maryjom]

• Links going to WCAG 2.1 accessibility supported Note 1 Level of Assistive Technology Support Needed for "Accessibility Support" link should be linking to https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/conformance#support-level and last note's Understanding Accessibility-Supported Web Technology Uses should be linking to https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/conformance#documented-lists
• Link going to WCAG 2.1 conforming alternate version should be linking to https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/conformance#conforming-alt-versions for the Understanding Conforming Alternate Versions.
• link broken relative luminance should be linking to: https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/contrast-minimum.html for the Understanding Success Criterion 1.4.3 link in the first note.
• Link going to WCAG 2.1 text alternative should be linking to Understanding Text Alternatives at https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/conformance#text-alternatives

Not sure if the appropriate links are supposed to be inserted through scripting or are fully defined in the definitions, but these need fixing.

[alastc]

Hi @maryjom,

Thanks for finding where they should go to, but I'm struggling to locate where they are linked from. Doing a search in the codebase for those doesn't seem to work, so I'm not sure where they link from.

[maryjom]

@alastc

• accessibility supported link is in this file: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/blob/main/guidelines/terms/20/accessibility-supported.html
• conforming alternate version link is in this file: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/blob/main/guidelines/terms/20/conforming-alternate-version.html
• relative luminance broken link is in this file: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/blob/main/guidelines/terms/20/relative-luminance.html
• Text alternative link is in this file: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/blob/main/guidelines/terms/20/text-alternative.html

[maryjom]

Seems that if only link targets change and none of the normative text changes, that the definition file is kept in the directory of the version of WCAG that introduced the term.

[maryjom]

This is still a problem. Since WCAG2ICT is embedding the Understanding Intent and WCAG 2 source code for definitions, there are still a few links in these files that are either going to WCAG 2.1 or broken. On today's WCAG2ICT call, @bruce-usab mentioned this and opened WCAG2ICT Issue 294. I have a PR for the one issue that was in the WCAG2ICT source, but the rest are in WCAG's source code.

[kfranqueiro]

These have been resolved in #3438 and #4586. Changes from the latter PR are only currently reflected in the editor's draft.