We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
informal_solution
This is the first problem that does not have the informal_solution field: https://github.com/trishullab/PutnamBench/blob/c092d1a/informal/putnam.json#L168
I think this is a bug, since many other problems have "None." for the informal_solution field. E.g. here: https://github.com/trishullab/PutnamBench/blob/c092d1a/informal/putnam.json#L160
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Good catch! This was missed in a fairly high number (67) of problems. I have made a fix in #258. Thank you for pointing this out!
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
This is the first problem that does not have the
informal_solution
field: https://github.com/trishullab/PutnamBench/blob/c092d1a/informal/putnam.json#L168I think this is a bug, since many other problems have "None." for the
informal_solution
field. E.g. here: https://github.com/trishullab/PutnamBench/blob/c092d1a/informal/putnam.json#L160The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: