You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for the amazing work! In the last FCOS model update, you divided regression head predictions by the FPN level stride value. However, why not divide regression predictions by the image size instead? In this case, all values would still be positive, and it would be possible to use a sigmoid activation at the regression output. I assume you did this intentionally, so I would like to understand the reasoning behind it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
RocketFlash
changed the title
Why regression head wasn't normilized ?
Why regression head wasn't normalized ?
Dec 28, 2023
Thank you for the amazing work! In the last FCOS model update, you divided regression head predictions by the FPN level stride value. However, why not divide regression predictions by the image size instead? In this case, all values would still be positive, and it would be possible to use a sigmoid activation at the regression output. I assume you did this intentionally, so I would like to understand the reasoning behind it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: