Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run Synthea within Module Builder #182

Open
arscan opened this issue May 23, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Run Synthea within Module Builder #182

arscan opened this issue May 23, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
difficult Especially difficult to implement enhancement medium priority

Comments

@arscan
Copy link
Member

arscan commented May 23, 2018

Being able to run modules from within the Module Builder would be extremely beneficial to module creators. Setting up Synthea locally is difficult for non-developers, and it's output isn't necessarily easy to understand.

From an implementation standpoint, the most straightforward approach would be to wrap synthea in a RESTful web service, which allows the interface to POST requests with all new/changed modules as part of the payload, and which returns data (patient records, statistics, or both). Ideally, the service would return information about how often states & transitions are visited, so we could provide a visual indicator of which paths are frequently/never followed.

This is difficult because it involves setting up hosting (though we could have it only be enabled within the MITRE network initially), and a fair amount of work on the front end to figure out how to display the output of a run within the interface. But I think it would be extremely useful to people trying to implement modules.

@dehall
Copy link
Contributor

dehall commented May 23, 2018

A lot of the necessary capability is already there in Synthea, we'd just need to wire it together.

For example, state & transition statistics: https://github.com/synthetichealth/synthea/blob/master/src/main/java/org/mitre/synthea/helpers/TransitionMetrics.java

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
difficult Especially difficult to implement enhancement medium priority
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants