ES private field check

[Danue1]

Describe the bug
ES private field check failed.

Input code

class Foo {
  static foo(foo) {
    return #foo in foo;
  }

  #foo = 'foo';
}

Config
default

Expected behavior
When lhs of "in" operator is a private identifier.

If there is a corresponding private field in the class definition, there is no error and it should be transpiled as it is.
If the corresponding private field does not exist in the class definition, an error should be raised that the corresponding private field in the class definition must exist.

Version
The version of @swc/core: 1.2.91

[Danue1]

I know the maintainers are busy.
If I get a guide on how to approach it, I'll try PR. Is it possible?
Although I am making a small financial support to swc, I also wanted to make a technical contribution.

[kdy1]

This is already implemented by #2079, but not published yet.

[Danue1]

good.
It's already been done...
I respect that speed.

[Danue1]

It's almost resolved, so I'll close the issue now.

[swc-bot]

This closed issue has been automatically locked because it had no new activity for a month. If you are running into a similar issue, please create a new issue with the steps to reproduce. Thank you.