You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
pySWATPlus is a excellent module to interact without the need of QSWAT+. For my study area, watershed delineation can't be handled by QSWAT+ due to 900 million cells. I use the 'Use existing watershed' option in the SWAT+ and prepare the input files by pyflwdir module (https://github.com/Deltares/pyflwdir) since it can handle large raster and give fast result. For 900 million cells, it take only 20 minutes to prepare all files. The SWAT+ developer Chris George helped me to avoid Dinf flow direction calculation when using the 'Use existing watershed' option?
Can you please add a function of HRU creation so that I can create a automatic simulation workflow from start to end without QSWAT+ intervention? It would be helpful for me to do multi-objective optimization of drainage filling in the DEM. We would be happy to collaborate also.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
pySWATPlus is a excellent module to interact without the need of QSWAT+. For my study area, watershed delineation can't be handled by QSWAT+ due to 900 million cells. I use the 'Use existing watershed' option in the SWAT+ and prepare the input files by pyflwdir module (https://github.com/Deltares/pyflwdir) since it can handle large raster and give fast result. For 900 million cells, it take only 20 minutes to prepare all files. The SWAT+ developer Chris George helped me to avoid Dinf flow direction calculation when using the 'Use existing watershed' option?
Can you please add a function of HRU creation so that I can create a automatic simulation workflow from start to end without QSWAT+ intervention? It would be helpful for me to do multi-objective optimization of drainage filling in the DEM. We would be happy to collaborate also.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: