The model that this Supermodel is based on is a small Semantic Web Ontology that defines the major model elements and other terminology used.
In this Specification, this implementation of the Supermodel model is presented via a series of "Levels" which are progressively more detailed, domain-specific, views of the model.
This view of the model is a backgrounding one which describes the underpinning model mecahnics that it uses. The object modelling used is based on the Web Ontology Language [OWL] and its own underlying use of RDF & RDFS [1]. The Provenance Ontology [PROV] is used to model real-world causal dependencies - provenance.
The figure below is a key for the elements in all of the model diagrams in this document.
The elements from the above subsection are shown in relation to one another in the figure below.
The elements shown above are identified with prefixed IRIs that correspond to entries in the Namespace Table. A short explanation of the diagram key elements is:
-
owl:Class
- represents any conceptual class of objects. Classes are expected to contain individuals - instances of the class - and the class, as a whole, may have realtions to other classes -
owl:NamedIndividual
- an individual of anowl:class
. For example, for the class ships, an individual might be Titanic -
rdf:property
- a relationship between classes, individuals, or any objects and Literals -
rdfs:subClassOf
- anrdf:property
indicating that the domain (from object) is a subclass of the range (to objects). An example is the class student which is a subclass of person: all students are clearly persons but not vice versa -
rdf:type
- the property that related anowl:NamedIndividual
to theowl:Class
that it’s a member of -
Literal
- a simple literal data property, e.g. the string "Nicholas", or the number 42. Specific literal types are usually indicated when used
General provenance/lineage information about anything - a rock sample, a dataset, a term in a vocabulary etc. - is described using the Provenance Ontology [PROV] which views everything in the world as being of one or more types in Figure 3.
According to PROV, all things are either a:
-
prov:Entity
- a physical, digital, conceptual, or other kind of thing with some fixed aspects -
prov:Agent
- something that bears some form of responsibility for an activity taking place, for the existence of an entity, or for another agent’s activity -
prov:Activity
- something that occurs over a period of time and acts upon or with entities
While not often in front of mind for objects in any Data Domain, provenance relations always apply, for example: a sosa:Sample
within the Sampling domain is a prov:Entity
and will necissarily have been created via a sosa:Sampling
which is a prov:Activity
. Another example: an sdo:Person
related to a dcat:Dataset
via the property dcterms:creator
in the DataCataloging domain is a specialised form of a prov:Agent
related to a prov:Entity
via prov:wasAttributedTo
.
The top-level view of the GA supermodel that assumes Level 0 background mechanics shows a set of 5 Data Domains which are:
These are shown in Figure 1 below.
These Data Domains are defined formally in a simple SKOS vocabulary within this model’s set of machine-readable resources. The vocabulary may be access ddirectly at https://linked.data.gov.au/def/supermodel/data-domains.
Elements at all other levels of detail in this model are classified according to these Data Domains by use of the dcat:theme
property, for example, the class sosa:Sample
is within the Sampling Data Domain, so it is defined as follows:
sosa:Sample
a owl:Class ;
dcat:theme super:sampling ;
...
.
The next level of detail after the Data Domains introduces the Central Classes. Here the most significant, general, class per Data Domain is indicated, along with the main relationships between each of them. Figure 2 shows this.
The Central Classes of each of the Data Domains are well-used classes from well-known models. For example, the Central Class of Organisation & People is [PROV]'s Agent
class which is one of the three main classes of thing in PROV and used every time PROV is used to represent causal agents. PROV is used extensively to indicate how things - data, resources, systems - come to be.
A list of the Data Domains' Central Classes, their definitions, as given by their defining systems, and their defining system are given in Table 2 below.
Data Domain | Central Class | Definition | Defined By |
---|---|---|---|
Data Cataloguing |
|
A collection of data that is listed in the catalog. |
Data Catalog Vocabulary [DCAT] |
Organisations & People |
|
An agent is something that bears some form of responsibility for an activity taking place, for the existence of an entity, or for another agent’s activity |
PROV-O: The PROV Ontology [PROV] |
Theming |
|
An idea or notion; a unit of thought |
Simple Knowledge Organization System ontology [SKOS] |
Observation & Sampling |
|
A Sample is the result from an act of Sampling. Feature which is intended to be representative of a FeatureOfInterest on which Observations may be made. Physical samples are sometimes known as 'specimens'. |
Sensor, Observation, Sample, and Actuator Ontology, within [SSN] |
Spatial |
|
A discrete spatial phenomenon in a universe of discourse |
GeoSPARQL Ontology [GEO] |
The definitions of the main relations between Central Classes are given in
Central Class | Definition | Defined By |
---|---|---|
|
A collection of data that is listed in the catalog. |
Data Catalog Vocabulary [DCAT] |
|
A Sample is the result from an act of Sampling. Feature which is intended to be representative of a FeatureOfInterest on which Observations may be made. Physical samples are sometimes known as 'specimens'. |
Sensor, Observation, Sample, and Actuator Ontology, within [SSN] |
|
A discrete spatial phenomenon in a universe of discourse |
GeoSPARQL Ontology [GEO] |
|
An idea or notion; a unit of thought |
Simple Knowledge Organization System ontology [SKOS] |
|
An agent is something that bears some form of responsibility for an activity taking place, for the existence of an entity, or for another agent’s activity |
PROV-O: The PROV Ontology [PROV] |
At this level, the main classes within each Data Domain are identified and related to one another. In each Data Domain there is a well-known model used for the majority of the classes and relations. These well-known models are indicated to ensure that they can be followed if extensions to this level’s modelling need to be made.
This subsection details the main elements of the Data Cataloguing Data Domain.
This Data Domain’s main classes are essentially the DCAT2 data model [DCAT] with a slight profiling: dcterms:hasPart
should be used to indicate elements within catalogues (e.g. dcat:Dataset
and other things within a dcat:Catalog
) rather than the specialised properties of dcat:dataset
because generic catalogue can be expected to catalogue many types of things and the type of the thing should be given by the thing, not the catalogue property used to indicate it.
This subsection details the main elements of the Organisations & People Data Domain.
This subsection details the main elements of the Theming Data Domain.
This Data Domain’s main classes are taken from [SKOS] and their expected/required properties and relations are formally defined in VocPub, a "vocabulary publication profile of SKOS" [VOCPUB]. VocPub just mandates certain vocabulary metadata and relations between elements in vocabularies. Conformance of vocabularies to VocPub is also easily testable using the profile’s validator and online tooling that support it [3].
This subsection details the main elements of the Spatial Data Domain.
This Data Domain’s main classes are taken directly from GeoSPARQL 1.1 [GEO] which is used extensively for Semantic Web spatial data already. GeoSPARQL’s main purposes are to relate things (geo:Feature
) to their spatial projections - their geometries - and to relate things to one another - topological relations between features, such as within, touches, disjoint etc.
Particular datasets tend to implement specialised types of things (usually referred to as Feature Types) and sometimes specialised relations between things, e.g. special hydrological catchment feature type might relate to another by being upstream of it. This is as per modelling in the Geofabric [4].