Skip to content

Commit c96bf82

Browse files
Merge pull request #135 from sjhbtue/feature_validation_sandia_jet
V&V case composition-dependent model (Sandia Jet)
2 parents fb55a40 + b333b6b commit c96bf82

35 files changed

+161
-0
lines changed

_data/vandv.yml

Lines changed: 4 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -11,3 +11,7 @@
1111
- 30p30n
1212
- swbli
1313
- LM_transition
14+
15+
- title: Incompressbile Flow
16+
vandv:
17+
- SANDIA_jet

_vandv/SANDIA_jet.md

Lines changed: 157 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
1+
---
2+
title: 2D Axisymmetric, Nonpremixed, Nonreacting, Variable Density, Turbulent Jet Flow
3+
permalink: /vandv/SANDIA_jet/
4+
---
5+
6+
| Solver | Version | Author |
7+
| --- | --- | --- |
8+
| `INC_RANS` | 7.5.0 | Sem Bosmans |
9+
10+
11+
The details of the 2D Axisymmetric, Nonpremixed, Nonreacting, Variable Density, Turbulent Jet Flow are taken from [Sandia National Laboratories database](https://tnfworkshop.org/data-archives/simplejet/propanejet/)$$^{1},^{2}$$.
12+
13+
By comparing the results of SU2 simulations case against the experimental data, as well as OpenFOAM simulation results $$^{3}$$ (and MFSim $$^{4}$$), we can build a high degree of confidence that the composition-dependent model is implemented correctly in combination with the SST turbulence model. Therefore, the goal of this case is to validate the implementation of the composition-dependent model in SU2.
14+
15+
## Problem Setup
16+
The problem consists of a turbulent propane jet mixing into coflowing air. The schematic overview of this problem is given in the figure below:
17+
18+
<p align="center">
19+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/VV_SETUP.png" alt="Schematic overview of the problem setup" />
20+
</p>
21+
22+
The flow conditions are based on the Sandia experiment $$^{1}$$:
23+
24+
- Temperature = 294 [K]
25+
- Thermodynamic pressure = 101325 [Pa]
26+
- Jet inner diameter = 5.26 [mm]
27+
- Jet outer diameter = 9.0 [mm]
28+
29+
The inlet conditions are given below:
30+
31+
Gas inlet:
32+
33+
- Bulk jet velocity = 53 [m/s]
34+
- Turbulence intensity = 4%
35+
- Eddy viscosity ratio = 5.0
36+
- Reynolds number = 68000
37+
38+
Air inlet:
39+
40+
- Velocity = 9.2 [m/s]
41+
- Turbulence intensity = 0.4%
42+
- Eddy viscosity ratio = 0.1
43+
44+
The thermochemical properties for the propane and air are presented below:
45+
* Propane:
46+
- Molecular Weight = 44.097 [g / mol]
47+
- Viscosity: 8.04E-06 [kg /(m s)]
48+
- Heat capacity at constant pressure: 1680.0 [J/(kg K)]
49+
- Thermal Conductivity: 0.0179 [W /(m K)]
50+
* Air:
51+
- Molecular Weight = 28.960 [g / mol]
52+
- Viscosity: 1.8551E-05 [kg /(m s)]
53+
- Heat capacity at constant pressure: 1009.39 [J/(kg K)]
54+
- Thermal Conductivity: 0.0258 [W /(m K)]
55+
56+
## Mesh Description
57+
58+
Structured meshes of increasing density have been used to perform a grid convergence study. The following four meshes have been used:
59+
60+
- 65x60 - 3556 quadrilaterals
61+
- 80x74 - 5442 quadrilaterals
62+
- 94x88 - 7649 quadrilaterals
63+
- 108x102 - 10267 quadrilaterals
64+
65+
The length of the domain in streamwise direction is 80D. the width is 20D. Additionally, an inlet section with a length of 30D is included upstream of the jet exit, in order to achieve fully-developed turbulent pipe flow.
66+
67+
If you would like to run the problem for yourself, you can use the files available in the [SU2 V&V repository](https://github.com/su2code/VandV/tree/master/rans/SANDIA_jet). The configuration file, as well as the grids in GEO format, are provided.
68+
69+
## Results
70+
71+
First, the results for the grid convergence study are presented. We will compare the convergence of the maximum value of the mixture fraction, as well as the mean axial velocity component at four locations with grid refinement. Additionally, a figure is included demonstrating the residual convergence histories for each mesh.
72+
73+
Based on the grid convergence study, we can build confidence that the compared simulation results are coming from a mesh independent solution, using the grid containing 7649 quadrilaterals.
74+
75+
The comparisons in the figures demonstrate good agreement with the experimental data and other codes, which builds high confidence in the implementation of the composition-dependent model in SU2 for the incompressible solver.
76+
77+
### Grid Convergence
78+
79+
<p align="center">
80+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/Grid_convergence4.png" alt="Mixture Fraction Grid Convergence x/D=4" />
81+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/Grid_convergence15.png" alt="Mixture Fraction Grid Convergence x/D=15" />
82+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/Grid_convergence30.png" alt="Mixture Fraction Grid Convergence x/D=30" />
83+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/Grid_convergence50.png" alt="Mixture Fraction Grid Convergence x/D=50" />
84+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/Grid_convergenceU4.png" alt="Velocity Grid Convergence x/D=4" />
85+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/Grid_convergenceU15.png" alt="Velocity Grid Convergence x/D=15" />
86+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/Grid_convergenceU30.png" alt="Velocity Grid Convergence x/D=30" />
87+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/Grid_convergenceU50.png" alt="Velocity Grid Convergence x/D=50" />
88+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/Residual_convergence.png" alt="Residual Convergence for the Turbulent Jet Mixing" />
89+
</p>
90+
91+
---
92+
93+
### Mixture Fraction
94+
95+
<p align="center">
96+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/YD0_f.png" alt="Mixture Fraction along Jet Centerline" />
97+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/XD04_f.png" alt="Mixture Fraction at x/D=4" />
98+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/XD15_f.png" alt="Mixture Fraction at x/D=15" />
99+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/XD30_f.png" alt="Mixture Fraction at x/D=30" />
100+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/XD50_f.png" alt="Mixture Fraction at x/D=50" />
101+
</p>
102+
103+
### Mean Axial Velocity
104+
105+
<p align="center">
106+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/YD0_U_norm.png" alt="Normalized Mean Velocity Decay along Jet Centerline" />
107+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/YD0_U.png" alt="Mean Velocity Decay along Jet Centerline" />
108+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/XD04_U.png" alt="Mean Axial Velocity at x/D=4" />
109+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/XD15_U.png" alt="Mean Axial Velocity at x/D=15" />
110+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/XD30_U.png" alt="Mean Axial Velocity at x/D=30" />
111+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/XD50_U.png" alt="Mean Axial Velocity at x/D=50" />
112+
</p>
113+
114+
### Mean Radial Velocity
115+
116+
<p align="center">
117+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/YD0_V.png" alt="Mean Radial Velocity along Jet Centerline" />
118+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/XD04_V.png" alt="Mean Radial Velocity at x/D=4" />
119+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/XD15_V.png" alt="Mean Radial Velocity at x/D=15" />
120+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/XD30_V.png" alt="Mean Radial Velocity at x/D=30" />
121+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/XD50_V.png" alt="Mean Radial Velocity at x/D=50" />
122+
</p>
123+
124+
### Turbulent Kinetic Energy
125+
126+
<p align="center">
127+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/YD0_TKE.png" alt="TKE along Jet Centerline" />
128+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/XD04_TKE.png" alt="TKE Velocity at x/D=4" />
129+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/XD15_TKE.png" alt="TKE Velocity at x/D=15" />
130+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/XD30_TKE.png" alt="TKE Velocity at x/D=30" />
131+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/XD50_TKE.png" alt="TKE Velocity at x/D=50" />
132+
</p>
133+
134+
### Density
135+
136+
<p align="center">
137+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/YD0_rho.png" alt="Mean density along Jet Centerline" />
138+
</p>
139+
140+
The experimental results for the mean density are given in Sandia’s database, but these are directly computed from the mixture fraction by making use of the ratio between the density of propane and air. The ratio that is being used for this purpose is 1.6 $$^{2}$$, whereas the expected ratio is lower. The higher density ratio used in the post-processing of the experimental data results in a wider
141+
density range across the domain, which can partly explain the differences between the experimental data and the numerical results on the density along the jet centerline. Note that the spreading rate of a jet is independent of the initial density ratio $$^{2}$$.
142+
143+
<p align="center">
144+
<img src="/vandv_files/SANDIA_jet/images/Residuals_convergence.png" alt="Residuals Convergence for the Turbulent Jet Mixing" />
145+
</p>
146+
147+
---
148+
149+
### References
150+
151+
$$^{1}$$ R.W. Schefer, "Data Base for a Turbulent, Nonpremixed, Nonreacting, Propane-Jet Flow", tech. rep., Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, 2001.
152+
153+
$$^{2}$$ R.W. Schefer, F.C. Gouldin, S.C. Johnson and W. Kollmann, "Nonreacting Turbulent Mixing Flows", tech. rep., Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, 1986.
154+
155+
$$^{3}$$ A. Aghajanpour and S. Khatibi, "Numerical Simulation of Velocity and Mixture Fraction Fiels in a Turbulent Non-reacting Propane Jet Flow Issuing into Parallel Co-Flowing Air in Isothermal Condition through OpenFOAM", 2023.
156+
157+
$$^{4}$$ V. Goncalves, G.M. Magalhaes and J.M. Vedovetto, "Urans Simulation of Turbulent Non-Premixed and Non-Reacting Propane Jet Flow", Associacao Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciencias Mecanicas - ABCM, 2021.
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
63.2 KB
Loading
352 KB
Loading
41.4 KB
Loading
277 KB
Loading
256 KB
Loading
321 KB
Loading
42.8 KB
Loading
276 KB
Loading
247 KB
Loading
310 KB
Loading
42.1 KB
Loading
279 KB
Loading
253 KB
Loading
286 KB
Loading
41 KB
Loading
274 KB
Loading
271 KB
Loading
340 KB
Loading
366 KB
Loading
354 KB
Loading
350 KB
Loading
274 KB
Loading
269 KB
Loading

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)