Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Is there a workaround for this? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Description
Follow up of structurizr/dsl#67:
deploymentGroupsare great but they have a limitation that makes them hard to use sometimes: Once in a group, instances "lose" connections with objects outside of the group.In the example bellow, we can see that the
DBcontainer is getting isolated as soon asdeploymentGroupsare used. I could add it to the group too, but for complex diagrams, it becomes really hard to maintain these groups.I wonder if it wouldn't be best to not force the external connections to a group to declare they're part of the group (ex:
containerInstance rails redis_cache,redis_persistent) and instead let the user define or redefine the new connections.In the example above again, the
"Cache and queue jobs"relationship works fine when a single node hosts redis. But in this case, we have two nodes using the same component, with two different purposes. I'd like to be able to define thatrailsis using redis for cache in theredis_cachegroup only.Priority
Low
Resolution
I have no budget and there's no rush, please add this feature for free
More information
No response
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions