Can we add eslint and prettier

[Gabiras12]

It would be helpful to have this template with eslint and prettier already setup

[10thfloor]

I think those are "developers choice" and it's better if this project is not opinionated in that way?
For example, I prefer https://biomejs.dev/ vs ESLint/Prettier, so would need to remove Prettier config ..etc.

[jayair]

Yeah I agree

[10thfloor]

@jayair However, there does appear to be a problem when adding providers to the base template:

❯ sst add pulumi
⠸  Adding provider...error: Cannot find package "prettier" from "[project]/.sst/platform/src/ast/add.ts"

[10thfloor]

 ❯ sst add pulumi --print-logs
 
time=2024-11-02T08:51:57.531-07:00 level=INFO msg="checking for pulumi" path="[redacted]/Library/Application Support/sst/bin/pulumi"
time=2024-11-02T08:51:57.808-07:00 level=INFO msg="checking for bun" path="[redacted]/Library/Application Support/sst/bin/bun"
⠋  Adding provider...time=2024-11-02T08:51:57.834-07:00 level=INFO msg="esbuild building" out=[redacted]/.sst/platform/sst.config.1730562717833.mjs
time=2024-11-02T08:51:57.843-07:00 level=INFO msg="esbuild built" outfile=[redacted]/.sst/platform/sst.config.1730562717833.mjs
time=2024-11-02T08:51:57.844-07:00 level=INFO msg="evaluating config"
time=2024-11-02T08:51:57.876-07:00 level=INFO msg="config evaluated"
time=2024-11-02T08:51:57.877-07:00 level=INFO msg="checking platform"
time=2024-11-02T08:51:57.877-07:00 level=INFO msg="getting package" name=@sst-provider/pulumi version=latest
⠸  Adding provider...error: Cannot find package "prettier" from "[redacted]/.sst/platform/src/ast/add.ts"

To fix I had to cd into [project]/.sst/platform and run bun install

But, that's not all. This is the output now:

❯ sst add pulumi             
✓  Added provider "supabase". You can create resources with `new supabase.SomeResource()`

Hmm.

[10thfloor]

Actually, I realize that pulumi isn't a provider in the directory of available providers(?), which may be why the output is misleading.

However, it did add an entry to my sst.config.ts that looks like this ...

  providers: { pulumi: "0.0.2" }

[jayair]

Hmm yeah that's weird. We should handle invalid providers better.