We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
checklevelprov doesn't consider the 'Control' Since time that GitHub reports. Instead it only considers what the previous provenance says.
That makes it pretty brittle in cases when we've lost provenance for some reason (like this tool that's in active development breaks ).
What if we add a --strict mode that if not enabled will take the older of the time reported in the prior provenance or the control time.
--strict
This should make things less brittle and help out if folks update their control but the provenance hasn't been lost.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
With #103 the source provenance now records the times that controls have been enabled since according to the GitHub API.
It also records the earliest available 'provenance' time.
Policy verification still requires that all the controls have been enabled at least since the date listed in the policy.
This change may make it easier to address failure to generate provenance.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
checklevelprov doesn't consider the 'Control' Since time that GitHub reports. Instead it only considers what the previous provenance says.
That makes it pretty brittle in cases when we've lost provenance for some reason (like this tool that's in active development breaks ).
What if we add a
--strict
mode that if not enabled will take the older of the time reported in the prior provenance or the control time.This should make things less brittle and help out if folks update their control but the provenance hasn't been lost.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: