|
40 | 40 | [Explain how the architecture is represented using the 4+1 View Model approach and how the views relate to each other.]
|
41 | 41 |
|
42 | 42 | ## Architectural Goals and Constraints
|
43 |
| -[Describe the software requirements and objectives that have significant impact on the architecture, such as technical constraints, quality requirements, or business constraints.] |
| 43 | +The architecture is designed to meet the following goals and constraints: |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +### Goals |
| 46 | +- [Goal 1] |
| 47 | +- [Goal 2] |
| 48 | +- [Goal 3] |
| 49 | +- [Goal 4] |
| 50 | +- [Goal 5] |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +### Constraints |
| 53 | +- [Constraint 1] |
| 54 | +- [Constraint 2] |
| 55 | +- [Constraint 3] |
| 56 | +- [Constraint 4] |
| 57 | +- [Constraint 5] |
44 | 58 |
|
45 | 59 | ## Use Case View ("+1" View)
|
46 |
| -[This view represents the scenarios and use cases that drove the architectural design.] |
| 60 | +The use case view represents the key scenarios that the system must support. |
47 | 61 |
|
48 | 62 | ### Key Use Cases
|
49 |
| -[Describe the architecturally significant use cases and scenarios that shaped the architecture.] |
| 63 | +1. **[Use Case 1]**: [Brief description] |
| 64 | +2. **[Use Case 2]**: [Brief description] |
| 65 | +3. **[Use Case 3]**: [Brief description] |
| 66 | +4. **[Use Case 4]**: [Brief description] |
| 67 | +5. **[Use Case 5]**: [Brief description] |
50 | 68 |
|
51 | 69 | ### Use Case Diagrams
|
52 |
| -[Include use case diagrams that illustrate the key functionality of the system from the user's perspective.] |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +*[Description of how this context diagram illustrates system interactions]* |
53 | 73 |
|
54 | 74 | ## Logical View
|
55 |
| -[This view describes the key functional elements of the system and their responsibilities, interfaces, and primary interactions.] |
| 75 | +The logical view describes the key functional elements of the system. |
56 | 76 |
|
57 | 77 | ### Overview
|
58 | 78 | [Provide a high-level description of the logical architecture.]
|
59 | 79 |
|
60 | 80 | ### Package/Component Architecture
|
61 |
| -[Describe the decomposition of the system into packages, layers, or other logical groupings.] |
| 81 | +The system is organized into the following key components: |
| 82 | +- **[Component 1]**: [Brief description] |
| 83 | +- **[Component 2]**: [Brief description] |
| 84 | +- **[Component 3]**: [Brief description] |
| 85 | +- **[Component 4]**: [Brief description] |
| 86 | +- **[Component 5]**: [Brief description] |
62 | 87 |
|
63 | 88 | ### Important Class Diagrams
|
64 |
| -[Include UML class diagrams for key classes/components and their relationships.] |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +*[Description of what this component diagram shows about the system structure]* |
65 | 92 |
|
66 | 93 | ### State Machine Diagrams
|
67 |
| -[Include state diagrams for elements with complex state behavior.] |
| 94 | +[Describe the key state transitions for important system entities] |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +```mermaid |
| 97 | +stateDiagram-v2 |
| 98 | + [*] --> State1 |
| 99 | + State1 --> State2: Transition trigger |
| 100 | + State2 --> State3: Transition trigger |
| 101 | + State3 --> State4: Transition trigger |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | + State2 --> AlternateState: Alternative path |
| 104 | + State3 --> AlternateState2: Alternative path |
| 105 | +``` |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +*[Description of what this state diagram represents]* |
68 | 108 |
|
69 | 109 | ### Data Model
|
70 |
| -[Describe the domain model and data structures.] |
| 110 | +Key entities in the system include: |
| 111 | +- [Entity 1] |
| 112 | +- [Entity 2] |
| 113 | +- [Entity 3] |
| 114 | +- [Entity 4] |
| 115 | +- [Entity 5] |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +```mermaid |
| 118 | +erDiagram |
| 119 | + ENTITY1 ||--o{ ENTITY2 : relationship |
| 120 | + ENTITY1 { |
| 121 | + type field1 |
| 122 | + type field2 |
| 123 | + type field3 |
| 124 | + } |
| 125 | + ENTITY2 ||--|{ ENTITY3 : relationship |
| 126 | + ENTITY2 { |
| 127 | + type field1 |
| 128 | + type field2 |
| 129 | + type field3 |
| 130 | + } |
| 131 | + ENTITY3 { |
| 132 | + type field1 |
| 133 | + type field2 |
| 134 | + type field3 |
| 135 | + } |
| 136 | + ENTITY4 ||--|| ENTITY2 : relationship |
| 137 | + ENTITY4 { |
| 138 | + type field1 |
| 139 | + type field2 |
| 140 | + } |
| 141 | +``` |
| 142 | + |
| 143 | +*[Description of what this ER diagram shows about the data relationships]* |
71 | 144 |
|
72 | 145 | ## Process View
|
73 |
| -[This view describes the system's dynamic aspects, concurrency, synchronization, and how the main abstractions from the logical view map into processes at runtime.] |
| 146 | +The process view describes the system's dynamic aspects. |
74 | 147 |
|
75 | 148 | ### Process Description
|
76 |
| -[Describe the processes in the system and how they communicate.] |
| 149 | +[Describe the key processes and workflows in the system] |
| 150 | + |
| 151 | +```mermaid |
| 152 | +sequenceDiagram |
| 153 | + actor Actor1 |
| 154 | + participant System1 |
| 155 | + participant System2 |
| 156 | + participant System3 |
| 157 | + |
| 158 | + Actor1->>System1: Action |
| 159 | + System1->>System2: Request |
| 160 | + System2-->>System1: Response |
| 161 | + |
| 162 | + alt Condition |
| 163 | + System1->>System3: Action |
| 164 | + System3-->>System1: Result |
| 165 | + else Alternative |
| 166 | + System1->>Actor1: Alternative action |
| 167 | + end |
| 168 | +``` |
| 169 | + |
| 170 | +*[Description of what this sequence diagram illustrates about process flow]* |
77 | 171 |
|
78 | 172 | ### Thread Usage
|
79 | 173 | [Describe how threading is used and managed.]
|
|
82 | 176 | [Describe the mechanisms used for communication between processes.]
|
83 | 177 |
|
84 | 178 | ### Process Diagrams
|
85 |
| -[Include activity diagrams, sequence diagrams, or other diagrams that illustrate dynamic behavior.] |
| 179 | + |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | +*[Description of what this container diagram shows about system interactions]* |
86 | 182 |
|
87 | 183 | ## Development View
|
88 |
| -[This view describes the system from a programmer's perspective and is concerned with software management.] |
| 184 | +The development view describes the system from a programmer's perspective. |
89 | 185 |
|
90 | 186 | ### Module Organization
|
91 | 187 | [Describe the organization of software modules, their dependencies, and interfaces.]
|
92 | 188 |
|
93 | 189 | ### Common Design Patterns
|
94 | 190 | [Describe any design patterns used consistently across the system.]
|
95 | 191 |
|
| 192 | +### Data Mapping Strategy |
| 193 | +The system employs a data mapping strategy to ensure loose coupling between layers and components: |
| 194 | + |
| 195 | +#### Mapping Principles |
| 196 | +- **[Principle 1]**: [Description] |
| 197 | +- **[Principle 2]**: [Description] |
| 198 | +- **[Principle 3]**: [Description] |
| 199 | +- **[Principle 4]**: [Description] |
| 200 | + |
| 201 | +```mermaid |
| 202 | +flowchart LR |
| 203 | + subgraph Group1 |
| 204 | + Component1[Component 1] |
| 205 | + Component2[Component 2] |
| 206 | + end |
| 207 | + |
| 208 | + subgraph Group2 |
| 209 | + Component3[Component 3] |
| 210 | + Component4[Component 4] |
| 211 | + end |
| 212 | + |
| 213 | + subgraph Group3 |
| 214 | + Component5[Component 5] |
| 215 | + Component6[Component 6] |
| 216 | + end |
| 217 | + |
| 218 | + Component1 <--> |Mapper| Component3 |
| 219 | + Component2 <--> |Mapper| Component4 |
| 220 | + Component3 <--> |Mapper| Component5 |
| 221 | + Component4 <--> |Mapper| Component6 |
| 222 | +``` |
| 223 | + |
| 224 | +*[Description of the data mapping flow between system components]* |
| 225 | + |
| 226 | +#### Data Mapping Tables |
| 227 | + |
| 228 | +##### [Layer 1] to [Layer 2] Mappings |
| 229 | + |
| 230 | +| Source Field | Target Field | Transformation | |
| 231 | +|-------------|-------------|----------------| |
| 232 | +| `Source.Field1` | `Target.Field1` | [Transformation description] | |
| 233 | +| `Source.Field2` | `Target.Field2` | [Transformation description] | |
| 234 | +| `Source.Field3` | `Target.Field3` | [Transformation description] | |
| 235 | +| `Source.Field4` | `Target.Field4` | [Transformation description] | |
| 236 | + |
| 237 | +##### [Layer 2] to [Layer 3] Mappings |
| 238 | + |
| 239 | +| Source Field | Target Field | Type | Description | |
| 240 | +|-------------|-------------|------|-------------| |
| 241 | +| `Source.Field1` | `Target.Field1` | `Type` | [Description] | |
| 242 | +| `Source.Field2` | `Target.Field2` | `Type` | [Description] | |
| 243 | +| `Source.Field3` | `Target.Field3` | `Type` | [Description] | |
| 244 | +| `Source.Field4` | `Target.Field4` | `Type` | [Description] | |
| 245 | + |
| 246 | +#### Benefits |
| 247 | +[Describe the benefits of the data mapping approach used] |
| 248 | + |
96 | 249 | ### Development Standards
|
97 | 250 | [Describe coding standards, tools, and other development conventions.]
|
98 | 251 |
|
99 | 252 | ### Package Diagrams
|
100 |
| -[Include package diagrams showing software organization.] |
| 253 | +Component structure follows a layered architecture pattern: |
| 254 | +- [Layer 1] |
| 255 | +- [Layer 2] |
| 256 | +- [Layer 3] |
| 257 | +- [Layer 4] |
| 258 | + |
| 259 | +```mermaid |
| 260 | +classDiagram |
| 261 | + class Layer1 { |
| 262 | + +Operation1() |
| 263 | + +Operation2() |
| 264 | + } |
| 265 | + |
| 266 | + class Layer2 { |
| 267 | + +Operation1() |
| 268 | + +Operation2() |
| 269 | + +Operation3() |
| 270 | + } |
| 271 | + |
| 272 | + class Layer3 { |
| 273 | + +Operation1() |
| 274 | + +Operation2() |
| 275 | + } |
| 276 | + |
| 277 | + class Layer4 { |
| 278 | + +Component1 |
| 279 | + +Component2 |
| 280 | + } |
| 281 | + |
| 282 | + Layer1 --> Layer2 |
| 283 | + Layer2 --> Layer3 |
| 284 | + Layer3 --> Layer4 |
| 285 | +``` |
| 286 | + |
| 287 | +*[Description of what this class diagram shows about the layered architecture]* |
101 | 288 |
|
102 | 289 | ## Physical View
|
103 |
| -[This view describes the mapping of software onto hardware and the physical connections between system components.] |
| 290 | +The physical view maps software to hardware infrastructure. |
104 | 291 |
|
105 | 292 | ### Deployment Topology
|
106 |
| -[Describe how software is assigned to hardware nodes, including servers, clients, and middleware connections.] |
| 293 | + |
| 294 | + |
| 295 | +*[Description of what this deployment diagram shows about the physical infrastructure]* |
107 | 296 |
|
108 | 297 | ### Infrastructure Requirements
|
109 |
| -[Describe the infrastructure requirements of the system, such as networks, servers, and storage.] |
| 298 | +[Describe the infrastructure requirements of the system, such as servers, networks, and storage.] |
110 | 299 |
|
111 | 300 | ### Deployment Diagram
|
112 |
| -[Include UML deployment diagrams showing the physical layout of the system.] |
| 301 | +[Describe how software is deployed onto hardware nodes] |
| 302 | + |
| 303 | +### Deployment Strategy |
| 304 | +The system is deployed using the following strategy: |
| 305 | + |
| 306 | +```mermaid |
| 307 | +flowchart LR |
| 308 | + Node1[First Stage] --> Node2[Second Stage] |
| 309 | + Node2 --> Node3[Third Stage] |
| 310 | + Node3 --> Node4[Fourth Stage] |
| 311 | + |
| 312 | + subgraph "Group1" |
| 313 | + Node1 |
| 314 | + Node2 |
| 315 | + end |
| 316 | + |
| 317 | + subgraph "Group2" |
| 318 | + Node3 |
| 319 | + Node4 |
| 320 | + end |
| 321 | + |
| 322 | + Node4 -- Relation --> Node5[Additional Node] |
| 323 | +``` |
| 324 | + |
| 325 | +*[Description of what this flowchart shows about the deployment strategy]* |
113 | 326 |
|
114 | 327 | ## Size and Performance
|
115 |
| -[Describe the major performance requirements and constraints that affect the architecture.] |
116 |
| - |
117 | 328 | ### Response Time
|
118 | 329 | [Describe expectations for system response times for key operations.]
|
119 | 330 |
|
|
127 | 338 | [Describe the expected utilization of computing resources.]
|
128 | 339 |
|
129 | 340 | ## Quality Attributes
|
130 |
| -[Describe how the architecture supports quality attributes.] |
131 |
| - |
132 | 341 | ### Security
|
133 | 342 | [Describe the security features and mechanisms of the system.]
|
134 | 343 |
|
|
148 | 357 | [List all documents referenced in this architecture document.]
|
149 | 358 |
|
150 | 359 | ## Appendices
|
151 |
| -[Include any additional information that supports the architecture document.] |
| 360 | +### Appendix A: Decision Records |
| 361 | +[Document key architectural decisions and their rationales.] |
| 362 | + |
| 363 | +### Appendix B: Risk Assessment |
| 364 | +[Provide risk assessment related to the architecture.] |
| 365 | + |
| 366 | +### Appendix C: Performance Test Results |
| 367 | +[Summarize performance test results if available.] |
0 commit comments