-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathreferences.bib
838 lines (815 loc) · 46.3 KB
/
references.bib
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
@article{knuth84,
author = {Knuth, Donald E.},
title = {Literate Programming},
year = {1984},
issue_date = {May 1984},
publisher = {Oxford University Press, Inc.},
address = {USA},
volume = {27},
number = {2},
issn = {0010-4620},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/27.2.97},
doi = {10.1093/comjnl/27.2.97},
journal = {Comput. J.},
month = may,
pages = {97–111},
numpages = {15}
}
@ARTICLE{Scholz2008-xs,
title = "Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of bacteria
belonging to the {Ochrobactrum-Brucella} group by recA and {16S}
{rRNA} gene-based comparative sequence analysis",
author = "Scholz, Holger C and Al Dahouk, Sascha and Tomaso, Herbert and
Neubauer, Heinrich and Witte, Angela and Schloter, Michael and
K{\"a}mpfer, Peter and Falsen, Enevold and Pfeffer, Martin and
Engel, Marion",
abstract = "The genetic diversity and phylogenetic interrelationships among
106 Ochrobactrum strains (O. anthropi: 72, O. intermedium: 22,
O. tritici: 5, O. oryzae: 2, O. grignonense: 2, O.
gallinifaecis: 1, O. lupini: 2), the type strains of the eight
Brucella species and other closely related taxa were studied by
recA and rrs gene (16S rRNA) comparative sequence analysis. Both
markers correctly delineated the various Ochrobactrum species;
however, resolution at the subspecies level was considerably
higher in the recA gene-based approach. Phylogenetic analyses
using neighbor-joining, parsimony, and maximum likelihood
algorithms generated trees with similar topologies but the
overall branching order, and also the order of the subclades,
were not stable in either assay, which could be explained by
generally high recA and rrs sequence similarities. Ochrobactrum
and Pseudochrobactrum formed separate clades distinct from other
Alphaproteobacteria with Bartonella, Agrobacterium, and
Rhizobium as the closest relatives. O. gallinifaecis was the
most distinct member, when compared to the type species O.
anthropi, with rrs and recA similarities of 96.2\% and 81.4\%.
Brucella species were indistinguishable, exhibiting high rrs and
recA gene similarities of 98.6\% and 85.5\% compared with
Ochrobactrum intermedium. At the protein level, all RecA
sequences among the various Ochrobactrum species and between
Ochrobactrum and Brucella were highly similar with only a few
amino acid substitutions. O. anthropi and O. tritici were
indistinguishable by means of their RecA proteins. A set of
initially biochemically classified strains did not cluster
within their assigned species and they either grouped within
other known species or grouped as potential novel Ochrobactrum
species. In further investigations, these strains were
reclassified and described as novel species. In summary,
Ochrobactrum is a highly diverse genus comprising several novel
species. We recommend recA- in addition to rrs gene-analysis for
correct species allocation and subtyping of novel Ochrobactrum
isolates.",
journal = "Syst. Appl. Microbiol.",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
volume = 31,
number = 1,
pages = "1--16",
month = mar,
year = 2008,
language = "en"
}
@ARTICLE{Laine2023-py,
title = "Global estimate of human brucellosis incidence",
author = "Laine, Christopher G and Johnson, Valen E and Scott, H Morgan
and Arenas-Gamboa, Angela M",
abstract = "Brucellosis is a major public health concern worldwide,
especially for persons living in resource-limited settings.
Historically, an evidence-based estimate of the global annual
incidence of human cases has been elusive. We used international
public health data to fill this information gap through
application of risk metrics to worldwide and regional at-risk
populations. We performed estimations using 3 statistical models
(weighted average interpolation, bootstrap resampling, and
Bayesian inference) and considered missing information. An
evidence-based conservative estimate of the annual global
incidence is 2.1 million, significantly higher than was
previously assumed. Our models indicate Africa and Asia sustain
most of the global risk and cases, although areas within the
Americas and Europe remain of concern. This study reveals that
disease risk and incidence are higher than previously suggested
and lie mainly within resource-limited settings. Clarification
of both misdiagnosis and underdiagnosis is required because
those factors will amplify case estimates.",
journal = "Emerg. Infect. Dis.",
publisher = "Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)",
volume = 29,
number = 9,
pages = "1789--1797",
month = sep,
year = 2023,
keywords = "Brucella; bacteria; brucellosis; brucellosis epidemiology;
brucellosis incidence; human brucellosis",
language = "en"
}
@ARTICLE{Hordt2020-ba,
title = "Analysis of 1,000+ type-strain genomes substantially improves
taxonomic classification of Alphaproteobacteria",
author = "H{\"o}rdt, Anton and L{\'o}pez, Marina Garc{\'\i}a and
Meier-Kolthoff, Jan P and Schleuning, Marcel and Weinhold,
Lisa-Maria and Tindall, Brian J and Gronow, Sabine and Kyrpides,
Nikos C and Woyke, Tanja and G{\"o}ker, Markus",
abstract = "The class Alphaproteobacteria is comprised of a diverse
assemblage of Gram-negative bacteria that includes organisms of
varying morphologies, physiologies and habitat preferences many
of which are of clinical and ecological importance.
Alphaproteobacteria classification has proved to be difficult,
not least when taxonomic decisions rested heavily on a limited
number of phenotypic features and interpretation of poorly
resolved 16S rRNA gene trees. Despite progress in recent years
regarding the classification of bacteria assigned to the class,
there remains a need to further clarify taxonomic relationships.
Here, draft genome sequences of a collection of genomes of more
than 1000 Alphaproteobacteria and outgroup type strains were
used to infer phylogenetic trees from genome-scale data using
the principles drawn from phylogenetic systematics. The majority
of taxa were found to be monophyletic but several orders,
families and genera, including taxa recognized as problematic
long ago but also quite recent taxa, as well as a few species
were shown to be in need of revision. According proposals are
made for the recognition of new orders, families and genera, as
well as the transfer of a variety of species to other genera and
of a variety of genera to other families. In addition, emended
descriptions are given for many species mainly involving
information on DNA G+C content and (approximate) genome size,
both of which are confirmed as valuable taxonomic markers.
Similarly, analysis of the gene content was shown to provide
valuable taxonomic insights in the class. Significant
incongruities between 16S rRNA gene and whole genome trees were
not found in the class. The incongruities that became obvious
when comparing the results of the present study with existing
classifications appeared to be caused mainly by insufficiently
resolved 16S rRNA gene trees or incomplete taxon sampling.
Another probable cause of misclassifications in the past is the
partially low overall fit of phenotypic characters to the
sequence-based tree. Even though a significant degree of
phylogenetic conservation was detected in all characters
investigated, the overall fit to the tree varied considerably.",
journal = "Front. Microbiol.",
publisher = "Frontiers Media SA",
volume = 11,
pages = "468",
month = apr,
year = 2020,
keywords = "G+C content; Genome BLAST Distance Phylogeny; chemotaxonomy;
genome size; morphology; phylogenetic systematics; phylogenomics",
copyright = "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
language = "en"
}
@ARTICLE{Moreno2023-yu,
title = "If you're not confused, you're not paying attention: Ochrobactrum
is not Brucella",
author = "Moreno, Edgardo and Middlebrook, Earl A and Altamirano-Silva,
Pamela and Al Dahouk, Sascha and Araj, George F and Arce-Gorvel,
Vilma and Arenas-Gamboa, {\'A}ngela and Ariza, Javier and
Barquero-Calvo, El{\'\i}as and Battelli, Giorgio and Bertu,
Wilson J and Blasco, Jos{\'e} Mar{\'\i}a and Bosilkovski, Mile
and Cadmus, Simeon and Caswell, Clayton C and Celli, Jean and
Chac{\'o}n-D{\'\i}az, Carlos and Chaves-Olarte, Esteban and
Comerci, Diego J and Conde-{\'A}lvarez, Raquel and Cook,
Elizabeth and Cravero, Silvio and Dadar, Maryam and De Boelle,
Xavier and De Massis, Fabrizio and D{\'\i}az, Ram{\'o}n and
Escobar, Gabriela I and Fern{\'a}ndez-Lago, Luis and Ficht,
Thomas A and Foster, Jeffrey T and Garin-Bastuji, Bruno and
Godfroid, Jacques and Gorvel, Jean-Pierre and G{\"u}ler, Leyla
and Erdenli{\u g}-G{\"u}rbilek, Sevil and Gusi, Amayel M and
Guzm{\'a}n-Verri, Caterina and Hai, Jiang and Hern{\'a}ndez-Mora,
Gabriela and Iriarte, Maite and Jacob, Nestor R and Keriel, Anne
and Khames, Maamar and K{\"o}hler, Stephan and Letesson,
Jean-Jacques and Loperena-Barber, Maite and L{\'o}pez-Go{\~n}i,
Ignacio and McGiven, John and Melzer, Falk and Mora-Cartin,
Ricardo and Moran-Gilad, Jacob and Mu{\~n}oz, Pilar M and
Neubauer, Heinrich and O'Callaghan, David and Ocholi, Reuben and
O{\~n}ate, {\'A}ngel and Pandey, Piyush and Pappas, Georgios and
Pembroke, J Tony and Roop, Martin and Ruiz-Villalonos, Nazaret
and Ryan, Michael P and Salcedo, Suzana P and
Salvador-Besc{\'o}s, Miriam and Sangari, F{\'e}lix J and de Lima
Santos, Renato and Seimenis, Aristarchos and Splitter, Gary and
Su{\'a}rez-Esquivel, Marcela and Tabbaa, Darem and Trangoni,
Marcos David and Tsolis, Renee M and Vizca{\'\i}no, Nieves and
Wareth, Gamal and Welburn, Susan C and Whatmore, Adrian and
Z{\'u}{\~n}iga-Ripa, Amaia and Moriy{\'o}n, Ignacio",
abstract = "Bacteria of the genus Brucella are facultative intracellular
parasites that cause brucellosis, a severe animal and human
disease. Recently, a group of taxonomists merged the brucellae
with the primarily free-living, phylogenetically related
Ochrobactrum spp. in the genus Brucella. This change, founded
only on global genomic analysis and the fortuitous isolation of
some opportunistic Ochrobactrum spp. from medically compromised
patients, has been automatically included in culture collections
and databases. We argue that clinical and environmental
microbiologists should not accept this nomenclature, and we
advise against its use because (i) it was presented without
in-depth phylogenetic analyses and did not consider alternative
taxonomic solutions; (ii) it was launched without the input of
experts in brucellosis or Ochrobactrum; (iii) it applies a
non-consensus genus concept that disregards taxonomically
relevant differences in structure, physiology, population
structure, core-pangenome assemblies, genome structure, genomic
traits, clinical features, treatment, prevention, diagnosis,
genus description rules, and, above all, pathogenicity; and (iv)
placing these two bacterial groups in the same genus creates
risks for veterinarians, medical doctors, clinical laboratories,
health authorities, and legislators who deal with brucellosis, a
disease that is particularly relevant in low- and middle-income
countries. Based on all this information, we urge
microbiologists, bacterial collections, genomic databases,
journals, and public health boards to keep the Brucella and
Ochrobactrum genera separate to avoid further bewilderment and
harm.",
journal = "J. Clin. Microbiol.",
volume = 61,
number = 8,
pages = "e0043823",
month = aug,
year = 2023,
keywords = "Brucella; Ochrobactrum",
language = "en"
}
@ARTICLE{Moreno2022-ha,
title = "Pathogenicity and its implications in taxonomy: The Brucella and
Ochrobactrum case",
author = "Moreno, Edgardo and Blasco, Jos{\'e} Mar{\'\i}a and Letesson,
Jean Jacques and Gorvel, Jean Pierre and Moriy{\'o}n, Ignacio",
abstract = "The intracellular pathogens of the genus Brucella are
phylogenetically close to Ochrobactrum, a diverse group of
free-living bacteria with a few species occasionally infecting
medically compromised patients. A group of taxonomists recently
included all Ochrobactrum organisms in the genus Brucella based
on global genome analyses and alleged equivalences with genera
such as Mycobacterium. Here, we demonstrate that such
equivalencies are incorrect because they overlook the
complexities of pathogenicity. By summarizing Brucella and
Ochrobactrum divergences in lifestyle, structure, physiology,
population, closed versus open pangenomes, genomic traits, and
pathogenicity, we show that when they are adequately understood,
they are highly relevant in taxonomy and not unidimensional
quantitative characters. Thus, the Ochrobactrum and Brucella
differences are not limited to their assignments to different
``risk-groups'', a biologically (and hence, taxonomically)
oversimplified description that, moreover, does not support
ignoring the nomen periculosum rule, as proposed. Since the
epidemiology, prophylaxis, diagnosis, and treatment are
thoroughly unrelated, merging free-living Ochrobactrum organisms
with highly pathogenic Brucella organisms brings evident risks
for veterinarians, medical doctors, and public health authorities
who confront brucellosis, a significant zoonosis worldwide.
Therefore, from taxonomical and practical standpoints, the
Brucella and Ochrobactrum genera must be maintained apart.
Consequently, we urge researchers, culture collections, and
databases to keep their canonical nomenclature.",
journal = "Pathogens",
volume = 11,
number = 3,
month = mar,
year = 2022,
keywords = "Brucella; Ochrobactrum; brucellosis; core genome; genus;
pangenome; species",
language = "en"
}
@ARTICLE{Bosilkovski2021-wt,
title = "The current therapeutical strategies in human brucellosis",
author = "Bosilkovski, Mile and Keramat, Fariba and Arapovi{\'c}, Jurica",
abstract = "Prompt and adequate treatment of human brucellosis continues to
be the most important strategy in its management, as eradication
of animal brucellosis is not possible so far, and there is no
adequate vaccine for humans. The goal of antibrucellar treatment
is to alleviate and shorten the symptomatic period and reduce
complications, relapses, and chronicity. Contemporary trends in
the treatment of human brucellosis are postulated on the ability
of Brucellae to persist in host macrophages through the
inhibition of phagolysosome fusion and to survive for prolonged
periods intracellularly without restricting basic cellular
functions. As a result of this and despite satisfactory
antibiotic treatment, relapses and therapeutical failures are
inevitable to a certain degree. The current principles for the
treatment of brucellosis advocate for a long enough treatment
duration combined with antimicrobial regimens that possess
activity in the intracellular acidic environment. In the future,
other antimicrobial agents, immunomodulation, decrease in the
intracellular acidic environment, or development of agents that
would act on well-defined molecular bacterial targets, might be
incorporated to improve the therapeutical effects.",
journal = "Infection",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media LLC",
volume = 49,
number = 5,
pages = "823--832",
month = oct,
year = 2021,
keywords = "Brucellosis; Outcome; Relapse; Treatment",
copyright = "https://www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining",
language = "en"
}
@ARTICLE{Hagiya2013-mv,
title = "Clinical characteristics of Ochrobactrum anthropi bacteremia",
author = "Hagiya, Hideharu and Ohnishi, Kouhei and Maki, Miyako and
Watanabe, Naoto and Murase, Tomoko",
abstract = "The clinical picture of Ochrobactrum anthropi infection is not
well described because the infection is rare in humans and
identification of the pathogen is difficult. We present a case
of O. anthropi bacteremia that was initially misidentified as
Ralstonia paucula and later identified by 16S rRNA sequencing
and recA analysis.",
journal = "J. Clin. Microbiol.",
publisher = "American Society for Microbiology",
volume = 51,
number = 4,
pages = "1330--1333",
month = apr,
year = 2013,
language = "en"
}
@ARTICLE{Franco2007-lj,
title = "Human brucellosis",
author = "Franco, Mar{\'\i}a P{\'\i}a and Mulder, Maximilian and Gilman,
Robert H and Smits, Henk L",
abstract = "Human brucellosis still presents scientists and clinicians with
several challenges, such as the understanding of pathogenic
mechanisms of Brucella spp, the identification of markers for
disease severity, progression, and treatment response, and the
development of improved treatment regimens. Molecular studies
have shed new light on the pathogenesis of Brucella spp, and new
technologies have permitted the development of diagnostic tools
that will be useful in developing countries, where brucellosis
is still a very common but often neglected disease. However,
further studies are needed to establish optimum treatment
regimens and local and international control programmes. This
Review summarises current knowledge of the pathogenic
mechanisms, new diagnostic advances, therapeutic options, and
the situation of developing countries in regard to human
brucellosis.",
journal = "Lancet Infect. Dis.",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
volume = 7,
number = 12,
pages = "775--786",
month = dec,
year = 2007,
language = "en"
}
@ARTICLE{Woese1990-mo,
title = "Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains
Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya",
author = "Woese, C R and Kandler, O and Wheelis, M L",
abstract = "Molecular structures and sequences are generally more revealing
of evolutionary relationships than are classical phenotypes
(particularly so among microorganisms). Consequently, the basis
for the definition of taxa has progressively shifted from the
organismal to the cellular to the molecular level. Molecular
comparisons show that life on this planet divides into three
primary groupings, commonly known as the eubacteria, the
archaebacteria, and the eukaryotes. The three are very
dissimilar, the differences that separate them being of a more
profound nature than the differences that separate typical
kingdoms, such as animals and plants. Unfortunately, neither of
the conventionally accepted views of the natural relationships
among living systems--i.e., the five-kingdom taxonomy or the
eukaryote-prokaryote dichotomy--reflects this primary tripartite
division of the living world. To remedy this situation we
propose that a formal system of organisms be established in
which above the level of kingdom there exists a new taxon called
a ``domain.'' Life on this planet would then be seen as
comprising three domains, the Bacteria, the Archaea, and the
Eucarya, each containing two or more kingdoms. (The Eucarya, for
example, contain Animalia, Plantae, Fungi, and a number of
others yet to be defined). Although taxonomic structure within
the Bacteria and Eucarya is not treated herein, Archaea is
formally subdivided into the two kingdoms Euryarchaeota
(encompassing the methanogens and their phenotypically diverse
relatives) and Crenarchaeota (comprising the relatively tight
clustering of extremely thermophilic archaebacteria, whose
general phenotype appears to resemble most the ancestral
phenotype of the Archaea.",
journal = "Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.",
publisher = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences",
volume = 87,
number = 12,
pages = "4576--4579",
month = jun,
year = 1990,
language = "en"
}
@ARTICLE{Barth2023-am,
title = "Rapid bacterial identification by {MALDI-TOF} {MS} directly from
blood cultures and rapid susceptibility testing: A simple
approach to reduce the turnaround time of blood cultures",
author = "Barth, Patricia Orlandi and Roesch, Eliane Wurdig and Lutz,
Larissa and de Souza, {\^A}ndrea Celestino and Goldani, Luciano
Zubaran and Pereira, Dariane Castro",
abstract = "Antimicrobial treatment of patients with bloodstream infections
(BSI) is time-sensitive. In an era of increasing antimicrobial
resistance, rapid detection and identification of bacteria with
antimicrobial susceptibility are critical for targeted therapy
early in the disease course. This study describes the
performance of a rapid method for identifying and testing
antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative bacteria performed
directly from blood culture bottles in a routine microbiology
laboratory. A total of 284, 120, and 24 samples were analyzed by
rapid identification (Rid), rapid susceptibility testing (RAST),
and rapid broth microdilution for polymyxin B (rMIC),
respectively, and compared with standard methods. Our protocol
was able to identify 93\% of isolates at the species level using
matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass
spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). We obtained 100\% agreement for
RAST compared to the standard method and 96\% agreement for
rMIC. Our protocol has proven to be an excellent tool for rapid
identification of Gram-negative bacilli causing BSIs. It can
also be used in microbiology laboratory routine along with RAST
and faster polymyxin microdilution, especially for
carbapenemase-producing bacteria, allowing for rapid, simple,
accurate, and cost-effective diagnosis.",
journal = "Braz. J. Infect. Dis.",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
volume = 27,
number = 1,
pages = "102721",
month = jan,
year = 2023,
keywords = "Blood cultures; MALDI-TOF; Polymyxin; RAST; Rapid
identification; Sepsis",
copyright = "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/",
language = "en"
}
@ARTICLE{Johnson2019-rb,
title = "Evaluation of {16S} {rRNA} gene sequencing for species and
strain-level microbiome analysis",
author = "Johnson, Jethro S and Spakowicz, Daniel J and Hong, Bo-Young and
Petersen, Lauren M and Demkowicz, Patrick and Chen, Lei and
Leopold, Shana R and Hanson, Blake M and Agresta, Hanako O and
Gerstein, Mark and Sodergren, Erica and Weinstock, George M",
abstract = "The 16S rRNA gene has been a mainstay of sequence-based
bacterial analysis for decades. However, high-throughput
sequencing of the full gene has only recently become a realistic
prospect. Here, we use in silico and sequence-based experiments
to critically re-evaluate the potential of the 16S gene to
provide taxonomic resolution at species and strain level. We
demonstrate that targeting of 16S variable regions with
short-read sequencing platforms cannot achieve the taxonomic
resolution afforded by sequencing the entire (~1500 bp) gene. We
further demonstrate that full-length sequencing platforms are
sufficiently accurate to resolve subtle nucleotide substitutions
(but not insertions/deletions) that exist between intragenomic
copies of the 16S gene. In consequence, we argue that modern
analysis approaches must necessarily account for intragenomic
variation between 16S gene copies. In particular, we demonstrate
that appropriate treatment of full-length 16S intragenomic copy
variants has the potential to provide taxonomic resolution of
bacterial communities at species and strain level.",
journal = "Nat. Commun.",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media LLC",
volume = 10,
number = 1,
pages = "5029",
month = nov,
year = 2019,
copyright = "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0",
language = "en"
}
% The entry below contains non-ASCII chars that could not be converted
% to a LaTeX equivalent.
@ARTICLE{Edgar2018-qb,
title = "Taxonomy annotation and guide tree errors in {16S} {rRNA}
databases",
author = "Edgar, Robert",
abstract = "Sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene is widely used
to survey microbial communities. Specialized 16S rRNA databases
have been developed to support this approach including
Greengenes, RDP and SILVA. Most taxonomy annotations in these
databases are predictions from sequence rather than
authoritative assignments based on studies of type strains or
isolates. In this work, I investigated the taxonomy annotations
and guide trees provided by these databases. Using a blinded
test, I estimated that the annotation error rate of the RDP
database is ∼10\%. The branching orders of the Greengenes and
SILVA guide trees were found to disagree at comparable rates
with each other and with taxonomy annotations according to the
training set (authoritative reference) provided by RDP,
indicating that the trees have comparable quality. Pervasive
conflicts between tree branching order and type strain
taxonomies strongly suggest that the guide trees are unreliable
guides to phylogeny. I found 249,490 identical sequences with
conflicting annotations in SILVA v128 and Greengenes v13.5 at
ranks up to phylum (7,804 conflicts), indicating that the
annotation error rate in these databases is ∼17\%.",
journal = "PeerJ",
publisher = "PeerJ",
volume = 6,
number = "e5030",
pages = "e5030",
month = jun,
year = 2018
}
% The entry below contains non-ASCII chars that could not be converted
% to a LaTeX equivalent.
@ARTICLE{Edgar2018-qi,
title = "Accuracy of taxonomy prediction for {16S} {rRNA} and fungal
{ITS} sequences",
author = "Edgar, Robert C",
abstract = "Prediction of taxonomy for marker gene sequences such as 16S
ribosomal RNA (rRNA) is a fundamental task in microbiology. Most
experimentally observed sequences are diverged from reference
sequences of authoritatively named organisms, creating a
challenge for prediction methods. I assessed the accuracy of
several algorithms using cross-validation by identity, a new
benchmark strategy which explicitly models the variation in
distances between query sequences and the closest entry in a
reference database. When the accuracy of genus predictions was
averaged over a representative range of identities with the
reference database (100\%, 99\%, 97\%, 95\% and 90\%), all
tested methods had $\leq$50\% accuracy on the currently-popular
V4 region of 16S rRNA. Accuracy was found to fall rapidly with
identity; for example, better methods were found to have V4
genus prediction accuracy of ∼100\% at 100\% identity but ∼50\%
at 97\% identity. The relationship between identity and taxonomy
was quantified as the probability that a rank is the lowest
shared by a pair of sequences with a given pair-wise identity.
With the V4 region, 95\% identity was found to be a twilight
zone where taxonomy is highly ambiguous because the
probabilities that the lowest shared rank between pairs of
sequences is genus, family, order or class are approximately
equal.",
journal = "PeerJ",
publisher = "PeerJ",
volume = 6,
number = "e4652",
pages = "e4652",
month = apr,
year = 2018
}
% The entry below contains non-ASCII chars that could not be converted
% to a LaTeX equivalent.
@ARTICLE{Edgar2018-cm,
title = "Updating the 97\% identity threshold for {16S} ribosomal {RNA}
{OTUs}",
author = "Edgar, Robert C",
abstract = "Abstract Motivation The 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene is widely
used to survey microbial communities. Sequences are often
clustered into Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) as proxies for
species. The canonical clustering threshold is 97\% identity,
which was proposed in 1994 when few 16S rRNA sequences were
available, motivating a reassessment on current data. Results
Using a large set of high-quality 16S rRNA sequences from
finished genomes, I assessed the correspondence of OTUs to
species for five representative clustering algorithms using four
accuracy metrics. All algorithms had comparable accuracy when
tuned to a given metric. Optimal identity thresholds were ∼99\%
for full-length sequences and ∼100\% for the V4 hypervariable
region. Availability and implementation Reference sequences and
source code are provided in the Supplementary Material.
Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at
Bioinformatics online.",
journal = "Bioinformatics",
publisher = "Oxford University Press (OUP)",
volume = 34,
number = 14,
pages = "2371--2375",
month = jul,
year = 2018,
copyright = "https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about\_us/legal/notices",
language = "en"
}
@ARTICLE{Maiden2013-jh,
title = "{MLST} revisited: the gene-by-gene approach to bacterial
genomics",
author = "Maiden, Martin C J and Jansen van Rensburg, Melissa J and Bray,
James E and Earle, Sarah G and Ford, Suzanne A and Jolley, Keith
A and McCarthy, Noel D",
abstract = "Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was proposed in 1998 as a
portable sequence-based method for identifying clonal
relationships among bacteria. Today, in the whole-genome era of
microbiology, the need for systematic, standardized descriptions
of bacterial genotypic variation remains a priority. Here, to
meet this need, we draw on the successes of MLST and 16S rRNA
gene sequencing to propose a hierarchical gene-by-gene approach
that reflects functional and evolutionary relationships and
catalogues bacteria 'from domain to strain'. Our gene-based
typing approach using online platforms such as the Bacterial
Isolate Genome Sequence Database (BIGSdb) allows the scalable
organization and analysis of whole-genome sequence data.",
journal = "Nat. Rev. Microbiol.",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media LLC",
volume = 11,
number = 10,
pages = "728--736",
month = oct,
year = 2013,
language = "en"
}
@INPROCEEDINGS{Mazloom2022-uv,
title = "{LINgroups} as a principled approach to compare and integrate
multiple bacterial taxonomies",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 13th {ACM} International Conference on
Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Health Informatics",
author = "Mazloom, Reza and Pritchard, Leighton and Brown, C Titus and
Vinatzer, Boris A and Heath, Lenwood S",
publisher = "ACM",
month = aug,
year = 2022,
address = "New York, NY, USA",
copyright = "http://www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright\_policy\#Background",
conference = "BCB '22: 13th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics,
Computational Biology and Health Informatics",
location = "Northbrook Illinois"
}
@ARTICLE{Tian2021-xc,
title = "{LINflow}: a computational pipeline that combines an
alignment-free with an alignment-based method to accelerate
generation of similarity matrices for prokaryotic genomes",
author = "Tian, Long and Mazloom, Reza and Heath, Lenwood S and Vinatzer,
Boris A",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Computing genomic similarity between strains is a
prerequisite for genome-based prokaryotic classification and
identification. Genomic similarity was first computed as Average
Nucleotide Identity (ANI) values based on the alignment of
genomic fragments. Since this is computationally expensive,
faster and computationally cheaper alignment-free methods have
been developed to estimate ANI. However, these methods do not
reach the level of accuracy of alignment-based methods. METHODS:
Here we introduce LINflow, a computational pipeline that infers
pairwise genomic similarity in a set of genomes. LINflow takes
advantage of the speed of the alignment-free sourmash tool to
identify the genome in a dataset that is most similar to a query
genome and the precision of the alignment-based pyani software
to precisely compute ANI between the query genome and the most
similar genome identified by sourmash. This is repeated for each
new genome that is added to a dataset. The sequentially computed
ANI values are stored as Life Identification Numbers (LINs),
which are then used to infer all other pairwise ANI values in
the set. We tested LINflow on four sets, 484 genomes in total,
and compared the needed time and the generated similarity
matrices with other tools. RESULTS: LINflow is up to 150 times
faster than pyani and pairwise ANI values generated by LINflow
are highly correlated with those computed by pyani. However,
because LINflow infers most pairwise ANI values instead of
computing them directly, ANI values occasionally depart from the
ANI values computed by pyani. In conclusion, LINflow is a fast
and memory-efficient pipeline to infer similarity among a large
set of prokaryotic genomes. Its ability to quickly add new
genome sequences to an already computed similarity matrix makes
LINflow particularly useful for projects when new genome
sequences need to be regularly added to an existing dataset.",
journal = "PeerJ",
publisher = "PeerJ",
volume = 9,
number = "e10906",
pages = "e10906",
month = mar,
year = 2021,
keywords = "Average nucleotide identity; Comparative genomics; Genome-based
taxonomy; Genomic similarity; Phylogenomics; Prokaryotes",
language = "en"
}
@ARTICLE{Pritchard2022-ti,
title = "Could a focus on the ``why'' of taxonomy help taxonomy better
respond to the needs of science and society?",
author = "Pritchard, Leighton and Brown, C Titus and Harrington, Bailey
and Heath, Lenwood S and Pierce-Ward, N Tessa and Vinatzer,
Boris A",
abstract = "Genomics has put prokaryotic rank-based taxonomy on a solid
phylogenetic foundation. However, most taxonomic ranks were set
long before the advent of DNA sequencing and genomics. In this
concept paper, we thus ask the following question: should
prokaryotic classification schemes besides the current
phylum-to-species ranks be explored, developed, and incorporated
into scientific discourse? Could such alternative schemes
provide better solutions to the basic need of science and
society for which taxonomy was developed, namely, precise and
meaningful identification? A neutral genome-similarity based
framework is then described that could allow alternative
classification schemes to be explored, compared, and translated
into each other without having to choose only one as the gold
standard. Classification schemes could thus continue to evolve
and be selected according to their benefits and based on how
well they fulfill the need for prokaryotic identification.",
journal = "Front. Microbiol.",
publisher = "Frontiers Media SA",
volume = 13,
pages = "887310",
month = may,
year = 2022,
keywords = "genomics; identification; phylogeny; prokaryotes; species;
taxonomic ranks; taxonomy",
copyright = "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
language = "en"
}
@article{Hofer2018,
title = {The majority is uncultured},
volume = {16},
ISSN = {1740-1534},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41579-018-0097-x},
DOI = {10.1038/s41579-018-0097-x},
number = {12},
journal = {Nature Reviews Microbiology},
publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC},
author = {Hofer, Ursula},
year = {2018},
month = oct,
pages = {716–717}
}
@article{Ondov2016,
title = {Mash: fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash},
volume = {17},
ISSN = {1474-760X},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-0997-x},
DOI = {10.1186/s13059-016-0997-x},
number = {1},
journal = {Genome Biology},
publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC},
author = {Ondov, Brian D. and Treangen, Todd J. and Melsted, Páll and Mallonee, Adam B. and Bergman, Nicholas H. and Koren, Sergey and Phillippy, Adam M.},
year = {2016},
month = jun
}
@ARTICLE{Henz2005-th,
title = "Whole-genome prokaryotic phylogeny",
author = "Henz, Stefan R and Huson, Daniel H and Auch, Alexander F and
Nieselt-Struwe, Kay and Schuster, Stephan C",
abstract = "Current understanding of the phylogeny of prokaryotes is based
on the comparison of the highly conserved small ssu-rRNA subunit
and similar regions. Although such molecules have proved to be
very useful phylogenetic markers, mutational saturation is a
problem, due to their restricted lengths. Now, a growing number
of complete prokaryotic genomes are available. This paper
addresses the problem of determining a prokaryotic phylogeny
utilizing the comparison of complete genomes. We introduce a new
strategy, GBDP, 'genome blast distance phylogeny', and show that
different variants of this approach robustly produce phylogenies
that are biologically sound, when applied to 91 prokaryotic
genomes. In this approach, first Blast is used to compare
genomes, then a distance matrix is computed, and finally a tree-
or network-reconstruction method such as UPGMA,
Neighbor-Joining, BioNJ or Neighbor-Net is applied.",
journal = "Bioinformatics",
publisher = "Oxford University Press (OUP)",
volume = 21,
number = 10,
pages = "2329--2335",
month = may,
year = 2005,
language = "en"
}
@ARTICLE{Meier-Kolthoff2013-ps,
title = "Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence
intervals and improved distance functions",
author = "Meier-Kolthoff, Jan P and Auch, Alexander F and Klenk,
Hans-Peter and G{\"o}ker, Markus",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: For the last 25 years species delimitation in
prokaryotes (Archaea and Bacteria) was to a large extent based
on DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH), a tedious lab procedure designed
in the early 1970s that served its purpose astonishingly well in
the absence of deciphered genome sequences. With the rapid
progress in genome sequencing time has come to directly use the
now available and easy to generate genome sequences for
delimitation of species. GBDP (Genome Blast Distance Phylogeny)
infers genome-to-genome distances between pairs of entirely or
partially sequenced genomes, a digital, highly reliable
estimator for the relatedness of genomes. Its application as an
in-silico replacement for DDH was recently introduced. The main
challenge in the implementation of such an application is to
produce digital DDH values that must mimic the wet-lab DDH
values as close as possible to ensure consistency in the
Prokaryotic species concept. RESULTS: Correlation and regression
analyses were used to determine the best-performing methods and
the most influential parameters. GBDP was further enriched with
a set of new features such as confidence intervals for
intergenomic distances obtained via resampling or via the
statistical models for DDH prediction and an additional family
of distance functions. As in previous analyses, GBDP obtained
the highest agreement with wet-lab DDH among all tested methods,
but improved models led to a further increase in the accuracy of
DDH prediction. Confidence intervals yielded stable results when
inferred from the statistical models, whereas those obtained via
resampling showed marked differences between the underlying
distance functions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high accuracy of
GBDP-based DDH prediction, inferences from limited empirical
data are always associated with a certain degree of uncertainty.
It is thus crucial to enrich in-silico DDH replacements with
confidence-interval estimation, enabling the user to
statistically evaluate the outcomes. Such methodological
advancements, easily accessible through the web service at
http://ggdc.dsmz.de, are crucial steps towards a consistent and
truly genome sequence-based classification of microorganisms.",
journal = "BMC Bioinformatics",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media LLC",
volume = 14,
number = 1,
pages = "60",
month = feb,
year = 2013,
language = "en"
}
@ARTICLE{Tindall1999-qe,
title = "Misunderstanding the Bacteriological Code",
author = "Tindall, B J",
abstract = "The Bacteriological Code contains Principles and Rules governing
the naming of prokaryotic taxa. However, interpretation of the
Code is not always easy, nor is the dynamic link between the
names of taxa and a particular taxonomic opinion always fully
appreciated.",
journal = "Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.",
publisher = "Microbiology Society",
volume = "49 Pt 3",
number = 3,
pages = "1313--1316",
month = jul,
year = 1999,
language = "en"
}