You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: README.md
+2-3Lines changed: 2 additions & 3 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -6,15 +6,14 @@ Early access to the unstable `java.util.json` API - taken from OpenJDK sandbox J
6
6
7
7
-**✅Enable early adoption**: Let developers try the unstable Java JSON patterns today on JDK 21+
8
8
-**✅API compatibility over performance**: Focus on matching the emerging "batteries included" API design rather than competing with existing JSON libraries on speed.
9
-
-**✅Track any official solution** track any `java.util.json` with matching API updates to be a potential "unofficial backport".
9
+
-**✅Track upstream API**: Match emerging API updates to be a potential "unofficial backport" if a final official solution ever lands.
10
10
-**✅Host Examples / Counter Examples** if anyone has any interest. GitHub wiki can be used for this if there is community interest.
11
11
12
12
## Non-Goals
13
13
14
14
-**🛑Performance competition**: This backport is not intended to be the fastest JSON library. The JDK internal annotations that boost performance had to be removed.
15
15
-**🛑Feature additions**: No features beyond what's in the official sandbox/preview public API. Demos and example code are most welcome.
16
-
-**🛑Production optimization**: The final official implementation will have cutrent and future JVM-level optimizations unavailable to a backport on Java 21.
17
-
-**🛑API stability**: This backport may, or may not, track the official specification develops (only if folks find it useful).
16
+
-**🛑Production / API stability**: Its an unstable API. It is currently only for educational or experimenal usage.
18
17
-**🛑Advoocacy / Counter Advocacy**: This repo is not an endorsement of the proposed API nor a rejection of other solutions. Please only use the official Java email lists to debate the topic.
0 commit comments