You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are instances, such as implementing/extending a class with a function that has an argument that your implementation won't use, which will trigger the no-unused-vars eslint rule.
Then the convention we are already using will automatically be ignored by the rule and we'll no longer have to explicitly disable the rule with an eslint-disable-line comment.
diff --git a/index.js b/index.js
index f8b966b..25051e9 100644
--- a/index.js+++ b/index.js@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ module.exports = {
'no-shadow-restricted-names': 'error',
'no-undef': 'error',
'no-undef-init': 'error',
- 'no-unused-vars': 'error',+ 'no-unused-vars': [ 'error', { 'argsIgnorePattern': '^_' } ],
'no-use-before-define': [ 'error', { 'functions': false } ],
'callback-return': [ 'error', [ 'callback', 'cb', 'next', 'done' ] ],
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ module.exports = {
// The standard ESLint `no-unused-vars' rule will throw false positives with
// class properties in TypeScript. The TypeScript-specific rule fixes this.
'no-unused-vars': 'off',
- '@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars': 'error',+ '@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars': [ 'error', { 'argsIgnorePattern': '^_' } ],
// For TypeScript code, `const`/`let` should be used exclusively
'no-var': 'error',
// new-cap throws errors with property decorators
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are instances, such as implementing/extending a class with a function that has an argument that your implementation won't use, which will trigger the no-unused-vars eslint rule.
Typically, we may just disable
no-unused-vars
when this occurs, such as here:https://github.com/silvermine/service-web/blob/77db28f0/service-web-core/src/model/Web.ts#L48
In these cases, we nearly always use a prepended underscore by convention to signify the arg is unused, but still have to disable the rule.
If we modify the rule like this:
Then the convention we are already using will automatically be ignored by the rule and we'll no longer have to explicitly disable the rule with an
eslint-disable-line
comment.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: