Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tcpcrypt low performance #9

Open
siavashfdst opened this issue Dec 30, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Tcpcrypt low performance #9

siavashfdst opened this issue Dec 30, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@siavashfdst
Copy link

siavashfdst commented Dec 30, 2016

Hi
I want to use tcpcrypt instead of SSL in my apache web server, but HTTPS performance is 10x better than tcpcrypt.
On ubuntu server 16.10 with apache Jmeter and tcpcrypt, average sample time (The number of milliseconds that the server took to fully serve the request ) is 200 ms! with using https, average is 18-20 ms. the same issue for connect time: 78 ms for HTTPS vs. 1026 for tcpcrypt.
Is there any solution?
Warning messages from tcpcrypt:
Webserver side: Can't find RDR
client (apache jmeter) side: No timestamp provided in packet - expect low performance due to calls to gettimeofday

@siavashfdst siavashfdst changed the title Tcpcrypt low performance - Ubuntu 16.10 Tcpcrypt low performance - Ubuntu 16.10 - Is Bittau and Boneh's paper, "The case for ubiquitous.." trustworthy? Dec 30, 2016
@siavashfdst siavashfdst changed the title Tcpcrypt low performance - Ubuntu 16.10 - Is Bittau and Boneh's paper, "The case for ubiquitous.." trustworthy? Tcpcrypt low performance - Is Bittau and Boneh's paper, "The case for ubiquitous.." trustworthy? Dec 30, 2016
@siavashfdst siavashfdst changed the title Tcpcrypt low performance - Is Bittau and Boneh's paper, "The case for ubiquitous.." trustworthy? Tcpcrypt low performance Feb 11, 2017
@lovrain
Copy link

lovrain commented Apr 27, 2017

hi,
Do you solve this problem? I encounter the same one

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants