How to make a proof available for Tuple if it exists for EmptyTuple and *:? #15690
s5bug
started this conversation in
General Discussion
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Take this method of proving that
Map[T, F ∘ G]
is equivalent toMap[Map[T, G], F]
:It doesn't make a proof available for
X <: Tuple
, that isfails.
While it is possible that one might call
proof[F, G, Tuple]
(or some other case that's irreducible), is there a way to prove that they're irreducible in the same way, and get a general proof out?cc @Adam-Vandervorst
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions