sbt 1.0 release

[pjfanning]

Is there a plan to release an sbt 1.0 compatible plugin? #132 is related.
I had a quick look regarding the sbt-dependency-graph build and found that sbt-pgp 1.1.0-M1 supports sbt 1.0. I raised sbt/sbt-scalariform#64. There seems to be more required for the sbt scripted-plugin than just uptaking org.scala-sbt#scripted-plugin_2.12;1.0.0.
I've tried the sbt-coursier plugin and it does work but it doesn't have the same features as this plugin.

[jrudolph]

Yes, definitely, there will be a release for sbt 1.0. Just didn't get to it due to summer outside :)

[hseeberger]

Summer outside? Not in Germany right now ;-)

[jrudolph]

I had a look at sbt 1.0 support at the weekend. It's far from trivial:

• sbt-dependency-graph uses data structures from sbt to figure out the dependency graph that probably can be considered internal to sbt and seem to have changed in sbt 1.0. I haven't looked into that in detail so I cannot even estimate what amount of work it would take to update / rewrite the core part of sbt-dependency-graph. In the best case things have just been moved around.
• sbt-dependency-graph still uses old (non-macro-based) Task definition syntax, this doesn't work any more in sbt 1.0, so the syntax needs to be adapted everywhere (simple to change but annoying)
• (minor) ascii-graph currently has no 2.12 version. For now, I'd just disable the dependencyGraph task for sbt 1.0, it was only useful for pretty small graphs any way.
• I need to decide whether to support cross-building for sbt 0.13.x and 1.x from one code-base. It might be a hassle in which case the current working 0.13 version could be maintained in its own branch. On the other hand, it would be definitely less confusing for users if there'd be only a single code base working for 0.13 and 1.0 at least for the time being. It might even be more efficient to make careful changes to still support 0.13 as well.

I'm treating this with some priority but depending on the amount of work it might still take a while. If someone wants to help just taking the existing code and fixing the deprecations against sbt 0.13 would help a lot.

[jrudolph]

If someone wants to help just taking the existing code and fixing the deprecations against sbt 0.13 would help a lot.

I managed to do these mostly yesterday evening. Someone also pointed to an old branch at https://github.com/jrudolph/sbt-dependency-graph/tree/w/sbt-1.0.0-M4-support I had forgotten about that could help with the first bullet point.

[kamilkloch]

sbt 1.0.1 is there :)

[jrudolph]

sbt 1.0.1 is there :)

Unfortunately, it hasn't fixed bugs like sbt/sbt#3299.

Anyway I have published a 0.8.3-SNAPSHOT version to sonatype for the brave ones.

[stephennancekivell]

Thanks for publishing the snapshot. I've given it a go on a fairly large project (~ 150 deps) without any issue.

[dwijnand]

Is sbt/sbt#3299 a show-stopping bug?

[dwijnand]

With regards to cross-building please note that https://github.com/dwijnand/sbt-compat is available, and I'm happy to accept changes for any shim required by sbt-dependency-graph.

[akauppi]

@dwijnand sbt/sbt#3299 was closed 7 days ago.

---

Oops, it was You who closed it. O:)

[benblack86]

0.8.3-SNAPSHOT is working well for me