You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am wondering how to reporduce the reported ablation study results in the paper. Specifically, in Tab. 3, the performance of "PARIMA", "PA", and "ARIMA" are provided, where (based on my understanding) Parima is the proposed approach leverages both viewport and object trajectories, PA/ARIMA are the baselines using object trajectories/viewport trajectories only.
Could you please kindly provide the sample implementation of the two baselines, PA and ARIMA as well if possible? It will be greatly helpful to evaluate and quantify the impact brought by the video semantics. Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I am wondering how to reporduce the reported ablation study results in the paper. Specifically, in Tab. 3, the performance of "PARIMA", "PA", and "ARIMA" are provided, where (based on my understanding) Parima is the proposed approach leverages both viewport and object trajectories, PA/ARIMA are the baselines using object trajectories/viewport trajectories only.
Could you please kindly provide the sample implementation of the two baselines, PA and ARIMA as well if possible? It will be greatly helpful to evaluate and quantify the impact brought by the video semantics. Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: