Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About the ablation study #20

Open
Tung-I opened this issue Nov 5, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

About the ablation study #20

Tung-I opened this issue Nov 5, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@Tung-I
Copy link

Tung-I commented Nov 5, 2023

Hi,

I am wondering how to reporduce the reported ablation study results in the paper. Specifically, in Tab. 3, the performance of "PARIMA", "PA", and "ARIMA" are provided, where (based on my understanding) Parima is the proposed approach leverages both viewport and object trajectories, PA/ARIMA are the baselines using object trajectories/viewport trajectories only.

Could you please kindly provide the sample implementation of the two baselines, PA and ARIMA as well if possible? It will be greatly helpful to evaluate and quantify the impact brought by the video semantics. Thanks.

@Tung-I Tung-I closed this as completed Nov 5, 2023
@Tung-I Tung-I changed the title PARIMA does not use object trajectories About the ablation study Nov 5, 2023
@Tung-I Tung-I reopened this Nov 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant