Skip to content

Rust version support policy for libc #305

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
kamalmarhubi opened this issue May 31, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Rust version support policy for libc #305

kamalmarhubi opened this issue May 31, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@kamalmarhubi
Copy link
Contributor

From #303, where supporting unions was discussed.

I still don't have a good handle on the community's thoughts on this—in nix we test against Rust 1.1 and up with an open issue to decide on a policy. I see that libc tests on 1.0 and up, which is an implicit version support policy. Is there an explicit one? I skimmed the README and RFC, but didn't spot anything obvious about it.

This will come up again once one of the bitfield RFCs get accepted and implemented, so it's worth thinking and being clearly explicit about.

For both unions and bitfields, it's a user code ergonomics and correctness win to have libc export as complete definitions of structs as possible.

I hope that the language survey will give an idea of how many people are on older language versions, so we can have a bit more of an idea of what dropping support would mean.
@kamalmarhubi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ugh connectivity issue. Dup of #304.

danielverkamp pushed a commit to danielverkamp/libc that referenced this issue Apr 28, 2020
@alexcrichton
Verify intrinsics don't leak to i686 (rust-lang#305)
bb123dd 
Some intrinsics take `i64` or `u64` arguments which typically means that they're
using 64-bit registers and aren't actually available on x86. This commit adds a
check to stdsimd-verify to assert this and moves around some intrinsics that I
believe should only be available on x86_64.

This commit was checked in many places against gcc/clang/MSVC using godbolt.org
to ensure that we're agreeing with what other compilers are doing.

Closes rust-lang#304
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@kamalmarhubi