You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hey there all, as part of #118, I'm starting the triage process of trying to find permanent homes for teams currently under the launching pad. As WG-async is also a working group, #91 is also relevant.
In this first pass, I'm making tracking issues for each of the teams, starting the discussion on whether y'all think there is a reasonable team you think would make sense to move under, and in general checking whether the members of these teams are still actively working on things related to these teams.
I see that meetings stopped mid this year (according to this page ), is WG-async still active as a group?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jamesmunns
added
the
A-teams
Area: Issues related to teams, such as forming new teams, team structure, etc.
label
Dec 20, 2024
It just makes wg-async -- as is -- a lang working group. It doesn't seek to resolve the larger questions of how we on lang might want to further refactor this. But that seems fine. We can later do that, as time permits, as could for any of our subteams.
This is a tracking issue for finding a long-term home for the WG-async team.
Leads:
Hey there all, as part of #118, I'm starting the triage process of trying to find permanent homes for teams currently under the launching pad. As WG-async is also a working group, #91 is also relevant.
In this first pass, I'm making tracking issues for each of the teams, starting the discussion on whether y'all think there is a reasonable team you think would make sense to move under, and in general checking whether the members of these teams are still actively working on things related to these teams.
I see that meetings stopped mid this year (according to this page ), is WG-async still active as a group?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: