Merge pull request #100 from aidanhs/patch-1

It is possible (if difficult) to statically link glibc

Author: brson

_posts/2016-05-13-rustup.md

@@ -183,10 +183,10 @@ libraries they have installed.
 [ELF]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executable_and_Linkable_Format
 
 Today's Rust depends on libc, and on most Linuxes that means
-glibc. For technical reasons, glibc cannot be fully statically linked,
-making it unusable for producing a truly standalone
+glibc. It's technically challenging to fully statically link glibc,
+which presents difficulties when using it to produce a truly standalone
 binary. Fortunately, an alternative exists: [musl], a small, modern
-implementation of libc that *can* be statically linked. Rust has been
+implementation of libc that can be easily statically linked. Rust has been
 compatible with musl since version 1.1, but until recently developers
 have needed to build their own compiler to benefit from it.