-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
EthicalAds: split .ethical-alabaster
CSS class into .ethical-light-theme
#477
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I looked at this briefly, and all the styling seems to be specific to Alasbaster? Seems like we should probably keep this named alabaster, and not apply it to other themes? Lines 204 to 219 in e7d1d5f
|
These rules work fine with Sphinx light themes, where we are already using it, that's why the rename was proposed. It seems it's not alabaster-specific. We can keep the |
But it seems like it's adding padding and adjusting the page around the alabaster theme, not anything to do with the color? |
Right, but we are using that class with those rules for other themes than alabaster. Even, for other documentation tools that are not Sphinx: Lines 88 to 191 in 398478a
|
Right, but I'm saying that it doesn't make sense to apply that class there? Is it actually doing anything, since the structure of the content isn't the same? I'm a little confused what the goal here is. Are we trying to make a class that applies different changes to light-themed docs that aren't already implemented? |
Have you tried removing that class and showing an ad on pages from those documentation tools?
The goal is to no use a class called |
We should not be using
.ethical-alabaster
for documentation tools that are not Sphinx and are not Alabaster theme. However, as they were looking better than the default style, we started used them there.We should create a new CSS class for these cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: