Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider referencing RFC 9000 S 21 #243

Closed
LPardue opened this issue Oct 30, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Consider referencing RFC 9000 S 21 #243

LPardue opened this issue Oct 30, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
has-pr

Comments

@LPardue
Copy link
Member

LPardue commented Oct 30, 2023

In your security considerations, consider referencing RFC 9000's and in particular https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9000#section-21.9.

I'm thinking of the additional workload that an IMMEDIATE_ACK could cause if the recipient decided to queue up work, and the recommendations that https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9000#section-21.9-4 makes wrt giving up on such naughty clients.
mirjak added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 12, 2024
@mirjak
add ref to RFC9000 21.9 in sec considerations
b1d8e51 
#243
@mirjak mirjak mentioned this issue Jan 12, 2024
Merged
@mirjak mirjak added the has-pr label Jan 12, 2024
@mirjak
Copy link
Contributor

mirjak commented Mar 1, 2024

merged #268

@mirjak mirjak closed this as completed Mar 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
has-pr
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@LPardue @mirjak