-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Closed
Description
Looking at the PRs currently tagged for v0.10.2, here is a proposed release plan:
Include in v0.10.2:
- Create
pvlib.iotools.read_panond
for reading .pan and .ond files #1749 - Allow asymmetrical rotation limits in
pvlib.tracking.singleaxis
(v2) #1852 - Update
singlediode.bishop88
parameter types in docs #1821 pvsystem.singlediode
withmethod='newton'
can be passedpd.Series
of length one. #1822- Lazify various calls to all() by using generators instead of comprehensions #1829
- Make interp IAM method available for modelchain #1832
- Add gallery example for simple irradiance adjustment for horizon shading #1849
- Allow PVSystems to be created with single Arrays #1854
- Add loss input to example in modelchain.with_pvwatts docs #1863
- Update isotropic transposition references #1864
fit_pvefficiency_adr
compatibility with scipy 1.11.2 #1866
Defer to the future:
- Add retrieval function for horizon profile from MINES Paris Tech #1295
- Add functions to read and retrieve SolarAnywhere irradiance data #1497
- Lcoe branch #1687
- Update detect_clearsky( ) #1708
- Linear shade gh1690 #1725
- Add function to retrieve example dataset paths #1763
- Add mismatch.py and function to combine curves #1781
- Add functions to fit and convert IAM models #1827
The milestone release target is currently set to Sep 15. Of course it is not a hard deadline, but since 0.10.2 is not a major release (i.e. these PRs are not breaking), we should not feel pressure to include the full list in this release.
As always, comments and PR reviews are very welcome!
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Type
Projects
Relationships
Development
Select code repository
Activity
cwhanse commentedon Sep 6, 2023
I'd like to add closing some small issues:
#1781 requires resolving the issue with convergence of
pvlib.singlediode.bishop88_v_from_i
#1787echedey-ls commentedon Sep 15, 2023
I'd like to help with #1814 ; is it just changing "defauls" to "defaults"? There's a huge amount of comments there.
cwhanse commentedon Sep 15, 2023
@echedey-ls please fix the typo. The discussion is about why that value is 9.144