You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
It would be great if the user could control which messages will trigger the webhook.
This feature can be extended to the channel level, allowing for the control of this channel or event, where no messages will be triggered on the webhook.
Use case:
My application supports typing events, but even with the debouncing of 10 seconds, these typing events come on my webhook channel, adding unwanted load to the servers.
Let me know your thoughts on the same.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
It would be great if the user could control which messages will trigger the webhook.
This feature can be extended to the channel level, allowing for the control of this channel or event, where no messages will be triggered on the webhook.
Use case:
My application supports typing events, but even with the debouncing of 10 seconds, these typing events come on my webhook channel, adding unwanted load to the servers.
Let me know your thoughts on the same.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: