Skip to content

Giscus comments #251

@bravo-kernel

Description

@bravo-kernel
Collaborator

Checklist

  • Issue has a meaningful title
    I have searched the existing issues. See issues

Summary of the request

We could consider adding Giscus comments (built on Github discussions) for pages:

  • Matches our audience
  • Upvotes, reactions, etc.
  • Easily moderated via github interface
  • Could lead to more interaction

Additional info:

Try it out here https://www.bravo-kernel.com/blog/2020/01/creating-a-scheduled-broken-links-checker-using-github-actions

Suggested section

None

Activity

changed the title [-]Giscus comments[/-] [+][Feature Request]Giscus comments[/+] on Jan 31, 2023
changed the title [-][Feature Request]Giscus comments[/-] [+]Giscus comments[/+] on Jan 31, 2023
fflaten

fflaten commented on Jan 31, 2023

@fflaten
Collaborator

Looks like a cool solution. Comments is a bit uncommon for docs-sites though, isn't it?

Off-topic: In your example, why does it look like you're talking to yourself? You mention someone else, but only your posts :)

bravo-kernel

bravo-kernel commented on Jan 31, 2023

@bravo-kernel
CollaboratorAuthor

I agree that it is a bit uncommon but I can imagine it making the hurdle to comment, ask, etc. much lower.

The reason you are seeing me talking to myself (online and in real-life now) is... that those comments were imported from Disqus (hover on a username).

nohwnd

nohwnd commented on May 2, 2023

@nohwnd
Member

Upvote on this, azdo has comments for wiki and it is very useful when the page becomes outdated and people post tips on how to actually do the thing the page describes.

fflaten

fflaten commented on May 2, 2023

@fflaten
Collaborator

Sounds great 👍
@bravo-kernel still working good on your blog. No issues after the theme-fix? Removing spam etc also works fine?

Usually I'd say GitHub-only would limit a comment-solution, but as it's already required to make a docs-issue it's fine.

bravo-kernel

bravo-kernel commented on May 2, 2023

@bravo-kernel
CollaboratorAuthor

No issues at all and even though spam is non-existent, annoying responses can always be deleted in Github Discussions.

linked a pull request that will close this issue on May 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

      Development

      Participants

      @bravo-kernel@fflaten@nohwnd

      Issue actions

        Giscus comments · Issue #251 · pester/docs