Skip to content

Conversation

@ehearne-redhat
Copy link
Contributor

See #30262 for reference.

In response to #30557 .

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: automatic mode

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Dec 3, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 3, 2025

@ehearne-redhat: This pull request references CNTRLPLANE-1437 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

See #30262 for reference.

In response to #30557 .

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and p0lyn0mial December 3, 2025 10:05
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

@ehearne-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

1 similar comment
@ehearne-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

@openshift-trt
Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented Dec 3, 2025

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 50d5f8a

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (20) are below the historical average (3012): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

Risk analysis has seen new tests most likely introduced by this PR.
Please ensure that new tests meet guidelines for naming and stability.

New tests seen in this PR at sha: 50d5f8a

  • "[Monitor:no-default-service-account-operator-checker][sig-auth] all pods must not use the default service account." [Total: 6, Pass: 6, Fail: 0, Flake: 4]

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

@ehearne-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@ehearne-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

Copy link
Contributor

@everettraven everettraven left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 5, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 5, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ehearne-redhat, everettraven
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign petr-muller for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@everettraven
Copy link
Contributor

@ehearne-redhat It might be worth attempting a payload aggregate run with these changes to ensure that we don't run into the aggregation issues again.

@ehearne-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/payload-aggregate e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade 5

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 5, 2025

@ehearne-redhat: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/9450d410-d1e0-11f0-882c-a218c0bbc32d-0

@ehearne-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/payload-abort

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 5, 2025

@ehearne-redhat: aborted active payload jobs for pull request #30561

@ehearne-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.21-upgrade-from-stable-4.20-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade 5

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 5, 2025

@ehearne-redhat: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.21-upgrade-from-stable-4.20-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/dc712f10-d1e0-11f0-8d8b-d2f1bf1f9557-0

@ehearne-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

@ehearne-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-vsphere-ovn

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 8, 2025

@ehearne-redhat: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ehearne-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

@everettraven - I checked the aggregate tests and I did not see any unique namespace names.

@everettraven
Copy link
Contributor

@ehearne-redhat feel free to add the verified label and ping the appropriate TRT folks for a re-review here :)

@ehearne-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

/verified by @ehearne-redhat

/assign @stbenjam @xueqzhan

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Dec 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ehearne-redhat: This PR has been marked as verified by @ehearne-redhat.

In response to this:

/verified by @ehearne-redhat

/assign @stbenjam @xueqzhan

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@ehearne-redhat
Copy link
Contributor Author

@stbenjam @xueqzhan feel free to take a look when you have a chance :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants