@@ -254,14 +254,21 @@ simplicity, only one axle model is computed (and animated). A tilting
254
254
feature and the independent axle adhesion model will be introduced in the
255
255
future.
256
256
257
- The advanced adhesion model uses two alternate algorithims to calculate the
258
- wheel adhesion. The first model is based upon an algorithim by Pacha, whilst the second
259
- uses an algorithim developed by Polach. The Polach algorithim provides
257
+ The advanced adhesion model uses two alternate algorithms to calculate the
258
+ wheel adhesion. The first model is based upon an algorithm by Pacha, whilst the second
259
+ uses an algorithm developed by Polach. The Polach algorithm provides
260
260
a more accurate outcome and facilitates the future inclusion of track conditions.
261
- However it is more CPU load intensive then the Pacha one. This can produce low
262
- frame rates for the screen display. Hence OR automatically sense the CPU load,
263
- and switches to the Pacha algorithim at high loads and to the Polach algorithim
264
- under lower CPU loads.
261
+ However due to the number of algorithm steps required to calculate the wheel adhesion
262
+ value, it is more CPU load intensive then the Pacha one. This can produce low
263
+ frame rates for the screen display in machines with low performance specifications.
264
+
265
+ Hence OR automatically senses the CPU load, and switches to the Pacha algorithm at
266
+ high loads and to the Polach algorithm under lower CPU loads. In this way OR attempts
267
+ to support the operation of lower specification computers. When OR is using the
268
+ Pacha algorithm, the "Wheel Adh (Max)" values will both read 99%, whereas when the
269
+ Polach algorithm is being used these values will be around the expected values of 30-55%.
270
+
271
+
265
272
266
273
The heart of the adhesion algorithim is the slip characteristics (pictured below).
267
274
0 commit comments