[PRE REVIEW]: mmrefpoints: Projecting long-term marine mammal abundance with bycatch

[whedon]

Submitting author: @mcsiple (Margaret Siple)
Repository: https://github.com/mcsiple/mmrefpoints
Version: v0.1.1
Editor: @fboehm
Reviewers: @ha0ye and @eirenjacobson
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/548532c08c82cf64015d5440c495a466"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/548532c08c82cf64015d5440c495a466/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/548532c08c82cf64015d5440c495a466/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/548532c08c82cf64015d5440c495a466)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mcsiple. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@mcsiple if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1309

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.11 s (641.4 files/s, 111965.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                             7            208             92           3429
R                               46            487           1472           3388
JSON                             2              7              0            682
Rmd                              8            445            993            606
Markdown                         5            108              0            398
TeX                              2             27              0            366
YAML                             3              2              4             29
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            73           1284           2561           8898
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '4dbac8429a4c7e4f6fe1ebd8' was
gathered on 2021/11/02.
No commited files with the specified extensions were found.

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1111/j.1748-7692.1998.tb00688.x is OK
- 10.1111/mms.12427 is OK
- 10.1644/11-MAMM-A-291.1 is OK
- 10.1093/icesjms/fsy049 is OK
- 10.1139/f84-058 is OK
- 10.2989/025776195784156511 is OK
- 10.1890/14-1990 is OK
- 10.1002/ece3.4772 is OK
- 10.7557/3.2747 is OK
- 10.3389/fmars.2021.735770 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[whedon]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[danielskatz]

👋 @Bisaloo - would you be able to edit this submission?

[danielskatz]

@whedon invite @Bisaloo as editor

[whedon]

@Bisaloo has been invited to edit this submission.

[fboehm]

If @Bisaloo isn't available to edit this, I'd be happy to edit it.

[danielskatz]

👋 @fboehm - given that @Bisaloo didn't ask for it, I suggested this, and you are interested, I'll just go ahead and assign it to you

[danielskatz]

@whedon assign @fboehm as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @fboehm

[mcsiple]

Suitable reviewers for this paper/package might be:
From the list (without @ tags, organized from bottom to top of list of people provided above):
crvernon
neerajdhanraj
tbrown122387
ha0ye

An additional reviewer who would be excellent and who is not listed is:
eirenjacobson

Thank you!

[fboehm]

@crvernon, @eirenjacobson, @neerajdhanraj, @tbrown122387, @ha0ye - would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[crvernon]

@fboehm Apologies, I am currently the editor for several other JOSS articles in-review and will not have time to be a reviewer on this one. Looks like a good one though! Kind regards!

[ha0ye]

Ooo, excited to see this from @mcsiple! I'd be happy to review, if a deadline of Dec 3 would be ok.

[eirenjacobson]

@fboehm, if you need a second reviewer, I would be happy to review!

[fboehm]

@whedon assign @ha0ye and @eirenjacobson as reviewers

[whedon]

OK, @ha0ye and @eirenjacobson is now a reviewer

[fboehm]

@whedon begin review

[whedon]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@whedon commands

[fboehm]

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List all of Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# Assign a GitHub user as the sole reviewer of this submission
@whedon assign @username as reviewer

# Add a GitHub user to the reviewers of this submission
@whedon add @username as reviewer

# Re-invite a reviewer (if they can't update checklists)
@whedon re-invite @username as reviewer

# Remove a GitHub user from the reviewers of this submission
@whedon remove @username as reviewer

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

# Change editorial assignment
@whedon assign @username as editor

# Set the software archive DOI at the top of the issue e.g.
@whedon set 10.0000/zenodo.00000 as archive

# Set the software version at the top of the issue e.g.
@whedon set v1.0.1 as version

# Open the review issue
@whedon start review

EDITORIAL TASKS

# All commands can be run on a non-default branch, to do this pass a custom 
# branch name by following the command with `from branch custom-branch-name`.
# For example:

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name

# Remind an author or reviewer to return to a review after a
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@whedon remind @reviewer in 2 weeks

# Ask Whedon to do a dry run of accepting the paper and depositing with Crossref
@whedon recommend-accept

# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references

# Ask Whedon to check repository statistics for the submitted software
@whedon check repository

EiC TASKS

# Invite an editor to edit a submission (sending them an email)
@whedon invite @editor as editor

# Reject a paper
@whedon reject

# Withdraw a paper
@whedon withdraw

# Ask Whedon to actually accept the paper and deposit with Crossref
@whedon accept deposit=true

[fboehm]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #3888.

[tbrown122387]

@fboehm it looks like you're all good on reviewers?

[fboehm]

@fboehm it looks like you're all good on reviewers?

Thanks, @tbrown122387 ! Yes, we ended up finding enough reviewers. Thanks again - I hope that we can work together on a future submission.

[fboehm]

@tbrown122387 - It turns out that we need another reviewer for this submission. Would you be willing to review it for JOSS over the next 4 to 6 weeks? Thanks again!

[tbrown122387]

@fboehm yeah sure I can help out

[fboehm]

@fboehm yeah sure I can help out

Thank you, @tbrown122387 ! I've now added you as a reviewer in the "review" issue, #3888. You should find a checklist to guide your review there.