You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
based on the discussion during the hybrid WG pre-OSW (minutes here)
the scope of work the WG agreed on: "To expand the number of use-case, define how to combine sd-jwt vc and json-ld based payload in way that uses sd-jwt vc as a securing mechanism, and allows to used w3c vcdm claims for business processing (compliance to w3c vcdm is not required)"
Rough consensus seems to be to extend annex B.4 in OpenID4VP to define IETF sd-jwt vc with and without json-ld processing
Next steps. Mainly Kristina and Alen with the help of others align on the proposal and do a PR in openid4vp
also agreement to do it in a way that does not slow down v1.0 publication
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
based on the discussion during the hybrid WG pre-OSW (minutes here)
the scope of work the WG agreed on: "To expand the number of use-case, define how to combine sd-jwt vc and json-ld based payload in way that uses sd-jwt vc as a securing mechanism, and allows to used w3c vcdm claims for business processing (compliance to w3c vcdm is not required)"
Rough consensus seems to be to extend annex B.4 in OpenID4VP to define IETF sd-jwt vc with and without json-ld processing
Next steps. Mainly Kristina and Alen with the help of others align on the proposal and do a PR in openid4vp
also agreement to do it in a way that does not slow down v1.0 publication
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: