Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

REQUIREMENT #1656

Open
kyoxera opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

REQUIREMENT #1656

kyoxera opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@kyoxera
Copy link

kyoxera commented Jan 30, 2025

Rename OpenAI to ClosedAI

#Deepseek

@kyoxera kyoxera closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jan 30, 2025
@kyoxera kyoxera reopened this Jan 30, 2025
@Taluen79
Copy link

OpenAI just proposed banning DeepSeek, claiming it’s “insecure” and tied to the CCP. Funny how they conveniently left out the fact that DeepSeek can run completely offline, while OpenAI’s models can’t. 🤔

What’s really insecure here? Maybe it’s OpenAI’s attempt to mislead lawmakers who might not understand the difference between private and public AI hosting. But WE KNOW.

DeepSeek has been a powerhouse in the AI community—open-sourcing research, driving innovation, and contributing in ways that actually move the field forward. Meanwhile, OpenAI’s name is starting to feel like a misnomer.

And let’s not forget the irony: accusing DeepSeek of being “in bed with the CCP” while OpenAI has an NSA association on its board? 🕵️‍♀️

It’s time to call out the double standards and demand transparency. The AI community deserves better.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants