Skip to content

🎯 Cadence VM (execution environment) goals - Q1 2025 #6881

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
6 of 19 tasks
j1010001 opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 4 comments
Open
6 of 19 tasks

🎯 Cadence VM (execution environment) goals - Q1 2025 #6881

j1010001 opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 4 comments
Labels
Epic Preserve Stale Bot repellent

Comments

@j1010001
Copy link
Member

j1010001 commented Jan 14, 2025

Previous goal tracker: #6577

Planned

Preview Give feedback
  1. Execution
    j1010001
  2. Feature Feedback
    m-Peter
  3. Documentation Execution Preserve Protocol
    janezpodhostnik
  4. Execution
    AlexHentschel fxamacker
    j1010001
  5. 4 of 19
    Epic Execution
    janezpodhostnik
  6. 2 of 4
    Execution
    fxamacker janezpodhostnik
  7. Execution
    zhangchiqing

Stretch goals

Preview Give feedback
  1. 1 of 2
  2. Execution performance
    fxamacker
  3. 2 of 2
    Execution
    janezpodhostnik
  4. Execution enhancement
    fxamacker
  5. Stale Tech Debt
  6. Performance Preserve

Unplanned work

Preview Give feedback
@j1010001 j1010001 added Preserve Stale Bot repellent Epic labels Jan 14, 2025
@fxamacker
Copy link
Member

fxamacker commented Feb 11, 2025

I added atree v0.9.0 to unplanned work because it required +8360 lines of code, weeks of testing, and it isn't mentioned in sprint kickoffs or release notes of packages using it (as of Feb 11).

@j1010001 as raised in our Thursday Jan 23 meeting, this was a part of higher priority unplanned work.
From Dec 20 to Jan 22:

  • ~30 days (worked on weekends too) for unplanned higher priority work
  • ~2 days for my OKRs (New Trie Research, Atree Refactoring)
  • 2 days off (postponed approved end-of-year time off, not taken yet as of Feb 11)

Higher priority work in private repos: I examined and reviewed thousands of lines of code in a repo where I'm not a codeowner, debugged+identified+fixed security bug, contributed ~9500 lines of code that got ported to 2 public repos, helped improve integration tests, ran 40+ smoke tests to reduce risk of regressions, etc.

Non-urgent PR reviews for teammates were also affected by this unplanned higher priority work.

@zhangchiqing
Copy link
Member

I was asked to review NBA topshot solidity contract which will be deployed to Flow EVM

https://flow-foundation.slack.com/archives/C07HCF7M6UR/p1739294310155879

@fxamacker
Copy link
Member

I completed an approved OKR-Q1 task that isn't listed here and it also isn't listed at Cadence Language Goals.

CCF 1.0.0 specification released on March 31, 2025 (release notes).

CCF is a binary data format defined in ccf_specs.md at onflow/ccf.

BTW, CCF README summarizes CCF specs and highlights a useful tip: CCF-based protocols can specify using CBOR Sequences (RFC 8742) to have the first data item contain metadata (e.g., version number and data item count).

@fxamacker
Copy link
Member

Added #7221 to unplanned list here (it started on March 18 as onflow/atree#539). It will fix build issues for external projects (e.g., reported by Anchorage Digital) that depend on newer version of fxamacker/cbor than we're using at onflow.

Code changes are mostly at fxamacker/cbor feature/stream-mode branch. So changes to each onflow repo can be tiny:

We need to update several onflow repos and run various tests before merging the version bump to main branches. Some repos may need tests not mentioned at atree (e.g., backward compatibility test for network messages).

Until we upgrade, additional external projects may run into build issues. By upgrading, we will also gain bug fixes, optimizations, features, etc. in fxamacker/cbor v2.5-v2.8.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Epic Preserve Stale Bot repellent
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants