@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ is distributed under the [ISC license](LICENSE.md).
77
77
- [ Programming with transactional data structures] ( #programming-with-transactional-data-structures )
78
78
- [ The dining philosophers problem] ( #the-dining-philosophers-problem )
79
79
- [ A transactional LRU cache] ( #a-transactional-lru-cache )
80
+ - [ The sleeping barbers problem] ( #the-sleeping-barbers-problem )
80
81
- [ Designing lock-free algorithms with k-CAS] ( #designing-lock-free-algorithms-with-k-cas )
81
82
- [ Understand performance] ( #understand-performance )
82
83
- [ Minimize accesses] ( #minimize-accesses )
@@ -1045,6 +1046,270 @@ val a_cache : (int, string) cache =
1045
1046
As an exercise, implement an operation to ` remove ` associations from a cache and
1046
1047
an operation to change the capacity of the cache.
1047
1048
1049
+ #### The sleeping barbers problem
1050
+
1051
+ The
1052
+ [ sleeping barber problem] ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleeping_barber_problem )
1053
+ is another classic communication and synchronization problem. Let's write a
1054
+ solution using ** Kcas** .
1055
+
1056
+ There are
1057
+ [ many ways to solve the problem] ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleeping_barber_problem#Solutions )
1058
+ and, in particular, there are concise and subtle implementations using
1059
+ semaphores or mutexes. Instead of transliterating a solution using semaphores,
1060
+ our approach uses queues and other concurrent data structures. We also solve the
1061
+ generalized problem with multiple barbers and we also implement a mechanism to
1062
+ close the barbershop. In addition, we abstract the concept of a barbershop,
1063
+ where barbers and customers interact. All of this makes our solution longer than
1064
+ the well known semaphore based solution. On the other hand, one might argue that
1065
+ our solution is a more direct transliteration of the problem. Our solution also
1066
+ avoids the starvation problem by using queues.
1067
+
1068
+ Let's begin by abstracting customer
1069
+
1070
+ ``` ocaml
1071
+ type customer = {
1072
+ notify_hair_has_been_cut : 'x.xt:'x Xt.t -> unit;
1073
+ }
1074
+ ```
1075
+
1076
+ and barber
1077
+
1078
+ ``` ocaml
1079
+ type barber = {
1080
+ wake_up : 'x.xt:'x Xt.t -> customer -> unit;
1081
+ }
1082
+ ```
1083
+
1084
+ actors. The idea is that barbers notify customers after finishing their haircut
1085
+ and, adhering to the problem description, customers wake up sleeping barbers.
1086
+
1087
+ A barbershop consists of any number of barbers and waiting customers and can be
1088
+ marked as closed:
1089
+
1090
+ ``` ocaml
1091
+ type barbershop = {
1092
+ sleeping_barbers : barber Queue.t;
1093
+ waiting_customers : customer Queue.t;
1094
+ is_closed : bool Loc.t;
1095
+ }
1096
+ ```
1097
+
1098
+ The barbershop constructor does not limit the number of barbers, which are
1099
+ assumed to bring their own chairs, but does require a specification of the
1100
+ number of waiting room chairs for customers:
1101
+
1102
+ ``` ocaml
1103
+ # let barbershop ~num_waiting_chairs =
1104
+ let sleeping_barbers = Queue.create ()
1105
+ and waiting_customers = Queue.create ~capacity:num_waiting_chairs ()
1106
+ and is_closed = Loc.make false in
1107
+ { sleeping_barbers; waiting_customers; is_closed }
1108
+ val barbershop : num_waiting_chairs:int -> barbershop = <fun>
1109
+ ```
1110
+
1111
+ Although the ` barbershop ` type is not abstract, we treat it as such, so we
1112
+ provide a transactional predicate to check whether the barbershop is closed or
1113
+ not:
1114
+
1115
+ ``` ocaml
1116
+ # let is_closed ~xt bs = Xt.get ~xt bs.is_closed
1117
+ val is_closed : xt:'a Xt.t -> barbershop -> bool = <fun>
1118
+ ```
1119
+
1120
+ To ` close ` a barbershop we set the ` is_closed ` location to ` true ` and clear both
1121
+ the sleeping barbers and waiting customers queues:
1122
+
1123
+ ``` ocaml
1124
+ # let close ~xt bs =
1125
+ Xt.set ~xt bs.is_closed true;
1126
+ Queue.Xt.clear ~xt bs.sleeping_barbers;
1127
+ Queue.Xt.clear ~xt bs.waiting_customers
1128
+ val close : xt:'a Xt.t -> barbershop -> unit = <fun>
1129
+ ```
1130
+
1131
+ A barber can try to get a customer sitting on a waiting room chair:
1132
+
1133
+ ``` ocaml
1134
+ # let get_sitting_customer_opt ~xt bs =
1135
+ Queue.Xt.take_opt ~xt bs.waiting_customers
1136
+ val get_sitting_customer_opt : xt:'a Xt.t -> barbershop -> customer option =
1137
+ <fun>
1138
+ ```
1139
+
1140
+ Or may go to sleep on the barber's own chair:
1141
+
1142
+ ``` ocaml
1143
+ # let sleep ~xt bs barber =
1144
+ if not (is_closed ~xt bs) then
1145
+ Queue.Xt.add ~xt barber bs.sleeping_barbers
1146
+ val sleep : xt:'a Xt.t -> barbershop -> barber -> unit = <fun>
1147
+ ```
1148
+
1149
+ Note that the ` sleep ` transaction uses the ` is_closed ` predicate. Barbers, as
1150
+ well as customers, must leave the shop in case it is closed.
1151
+
1152
+ A customer can try to find a sleeping barber:
1153
+
1154
+ ``` ocaml
1155
+ # let get_sleeping_barber_opt ~xt bs =
1156
+ Queue.Xt.take_opt ~xt bs.sleeping_barbers
1157
+ val get_sleeping_barber_opt : xt:'a Xt.t -> barbershop -> barber option =
1158
+ <fun>
1159
+ ```
1160
+
1161
+ Or sit on a waiting room chair:
1162
+
1163
+ ``` ocaml
1164
+ # let try_sitting ~xt bs customer =
1165
+ not (is_closed ~xt bs) &&
1166
+ Queue.Xt.try_add ~xt customer bs.waiting_customers
1167
+ val try_sitting : xt:'a Xt.t -> barbershop -> customer -> bool = <fun>
1168
+ ```
1169
+
1170
+ The above ` try_sitting ` transaction is non-blocking. In case the
1171
+ ` waiting_customers ` queue is full, it will return ` false ` . With the ` customer `
1172
+ actor implementation we'll look at shortly this would mean that customers would
1173
+ busy-wait, which works, but potentially wastes energy. Here is a blocking
1174
+ version of ` try_sitting ` :
1175
+
1176
+ ``` ocaml
1177
+ # let try_sitting ~xt bs customer =
1178
+ not (is_closed ~xt bs) &&
1179
+ begin
1180
+ Queue.Xt.add ~xt customer bs.waiting_customers;
1181
+ true
1182
+ end
1183
+ val try_sitting : xt:'a Xt.t -> barbershop -> customer -> bool = <fun>
1184
+ ```
1185
+
1186
+ Both of the above ` try_sitting ` transactions work with the ` customer ` actor
1187
+ we'll see shortly, but with the latter blocking version we avoid busy-wait.
1188
+
1189
+ The above constitutes the barbershop abstraction which is a kind of passive
1190
+ concurrent data structure. Let's then implement the active participants of the
1191
+ problem.
1192
+
1193
+ A customer tries to get a haircut. When a customer enter the barbershop he first
1194
+ tries to find a sleeping barber. If none is available, the customer then tries
1195
+ to sit on a waiting room chair. If both fail, then the customer has no option
1196
+ except to retry. Otherwise the customer waits to get a haircut. If the shop is
1197
+ closed, the customer exits. Here is the ` customer ` actor:
1198
+
1199
+ ``` ocaml
1200
+ # let customer shop cuts =
1201
+ let clean = Mvar.create None in
1202
+ let self = { notify_hair_has_been_cut = Mvar.Xt.put clean true } in
1203
+ while not (Xt.commit { tx = is_closed shop }) do
1204
+ let get_barber_opt ~xt =
1205
+ match get_sleeping_barber_opt ~xt shop with
1206
+ | None ->
1207
+ try_sitting ~xt shop self
1208
+ | Some barber ->
1209
+ barber.wake_up ~xt self;
1210
+ true
1211
+ in
1212
+ if Xt.commit { tx = get_barber_opt } then
1213
+ let try_await_haircut ~xt =
1214
+ not (is_closed ~xt shop) &&
1215
+ Mvar.Xt.take ~xt clean
1216
+ in
1217
+ if Xt.commit { tx = try_await_haircut } then
1218
+ Loc.incr cuts
1219
+ done
1220
+ val customer : barbershop -> int Loc.t -> unit = <fun>
1221
+ ```
1222
+
1223
+ A barber tries to get a customer to give a haircut. A barber first looks for a
1224
+ customer from the waiting room. If none is available, the barber goes to sleep
1225
+ waiting for a wakeup from a customer. After obtaining a customer in either way,
1226
+ the barber gives a haircut to the customer. Otherwise the shop must be closed
1227
+ and the barber exits. Here is the ` barber ` actor:
1228
+
1229
+ ``` ocaml
1230
+ # let barber shop cuts =
1231
+ let customer = Mvar.create None in
1232
+ let self = { wake_up = Mvar.Xt.put customer } in
1233
+ while not (Xt.commit { tx = is_closed shop }) do
1234
+ let cut customer =
1235
+ Xt.commit { tx = customer.notify_hair_has_been_cut };
1236
+ Loc.incr cuts
1237
+ in
1238
+ let get_customer_opt ~xt =
1239
+ match get_sitting_customer_opt ~xt shop with
1240
+ | Some _ as some -> some
1241
+ | None ->
1242
+ sleep ~xt shop self;
1243
+ None
1244
+ in
1245
+ match Xt.commit { tx = get_customer_opt } with
1246
+ | Some customer -> cut customer
1247
+ | None ->
1248
+ let await_wakeup_opt ~xt =
1249
+ if is_closed ~xt shop then None
1250
+ else Some (Mvar.Xt.take ~xt customer)
1251
+ in
1252
+ match Xt.commit { tx = await_wakeup_opt } with
1253
+ | Some customer -> cut customer
1254
+ | None -> ()
1255
+ done
1256
+ val barber : barbershop -> int Loc.t -> unit = <fun>
1257
+ ```
1258
+
1259
+ To run the problem, a barbershop is created with given number of waiting room
1260
+ chairs, is populated by given number of barbers, and a given number of customers
1261
+ are spawned. Once each barber has given and each customer has received a given
1262
+ number of haircuts the shop is closed. This termination condition seeks to
1263
+ demonstrate that no actor is starved. Here is the ` sleeping_barbers ` setup:
1264
+
1265
+ ``` ocaml
1266
+ # let sleeping_barbers ~barbers
1267
+ ~num_waiting_chairs
1268
+ ~customers
1269
+ ~cuts_per_actor =
1270
+ assert (0 < barbers
1271
+ && 0 <= num_waiting_chairs
1272
+ && 0 <= customers
1273
+ && 0 <= cuts_per_actor);
1274
+ let shop = barbershop ~num_waiting_chairs in
1275
+ let barbers = Array.init barbers @@ fun _ ->
1276
+ let cuts = Loc.make 0 in
1277
+ (cuts, Domain.spawn @@ (fun () -> barber shop cuts))
1278
+ and customers = Array.init customers @@ fun _ ->
1279
+ let cuts = Loc.make 0 in
1280
+ (cuts, Domain.spawn @@ (fun () -> customer shop cuts))
1281
+ in
1282
+ let agents = Array.append barbers customers in
1283
+ while agents
1284
+ |> Array.map fst
1285
+ |> Array.exists @@ fun c ->
1286
+ Loc.get c < cuts_per_actor do
1287
+ Domain.cpu_relax ()
1288
+ done;
1289
+ Xt.commit { tx = close shop };
1290
+ agents
1291
+ |> Array.map snd
1292
+ |> Array.iter Domain.join
1293
+ val sleeping_barbers :
1294
+ barbers:int ->
1295
+ num_waiting_chairs:int -> customers:int -> cuts_per_actor:int -> unit =
1296
+ <fun>
1297
+ ```
1298
+
1299
+ Finally, let's try our solution:
1300
+
1301
+ ``` ocaml
1302
+ # sleeping_barbers ~barbers:2
1303
+ ~num_waiting_chairs:1
1304
+ ~customers:4
1305
+ ~cuts_per_actor:10
1306
+ - : unit = ()
1307
+ ```
1308
+
1309
+ Like mentioned in the beginning, this is not the most concise solution of the
1310
+ sleeping barbers problem, but hopefully this solution can be understood
1311
+ relatively easily with respect to the problem description.
1312
+
1048
1313
## Designing lock-free algorithms with k-CAS
1049
1314
1050
1315
The key benefit of k-CAS, or k-CAS-n-CMP, and transactions in particular, is
0 commit comments