docs: add meeting notes from 2022-02-16 call

Author: darcyclarke

meetings/2022-02-16.md

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+#### Meeting from: February 16th, 2022
+
+# Open RFC Meeting (npm)
+
+### Attendees
+- Darcy Clarke (@darcyclarke)
+- Nathan Fritz (@fritzy)
+- Ruy Adorno (@ruyadorno)
+- Jordan Harband (@ljharb)
+- Owen Buckley (@thescientist13)
+
+### Previously...
+
+- [2022-02-09](https://github.com/npm/rfcs/blob/main/meetings/2022-02-09.md)
+
+### Agenda
+
+1. **Housekeeping**
+	1. Introduction(s)
+	1. [Code of Conduct Acknowledgement](https://www.npmjs.com/policies/conduct)
+	1. Outline Intentions & Desired Outcomes
+	1. Announcements
+	   - OpenJS World 2022 
+	       - https://events.linuxfoundation.org/openjs-world/
+	       - CFP: https://events.linuxfoundation.org/openjs-world/program/cfp/
+       - https://2021.stateofjs.com
+2. **PR**: [#525 Stop storing `integrity` for git dependencies](https://github.com/npm/rfcs/pull/525) - @nlf
+  - @ruyadorno 
+    - what if we steered users away from git dependencies in general? 
+    - maybe we throw warnings
+    - maybe we start notifying we're deprecating
+    - definitely on board with this idea
+  - @ljharb
+    - git deps should only be for development
+    - how do file dependencies behave? we should mimic that experience
+  - @fritzy
+    - we should warn when we see transitive dependencies that are gi deps
+  - @ljharb
+    - maintainers would have to fork & publish
+    - deprecation indicates discouragement
+    - not sure this is a good thing in anyway
+  - @ruyadorno 
+    - we could do this under a config value to skip git dependencies (ex. `--ignore-git-deps`) 
+  - @ljharb
+    - Node has a Policies feature
+    - npm could/should probably support this
+    - Package authors' declared policies / capabilities
+4. **PR**: [#522 Option for npm diff to ignore cr at eol](https://github.com/npm/rfcs/pull/522) - @oBusk
+  - @ruyadorno 
+    - we should do whatever `git diff` does/supports
+    - lets follow the naming of the `git` flag
+    - keep open for another week & then ratify   
+5. **PR**: [#4260 feat(arborist)(reify): add an ability to add a hook](https://github.com/npm/cli/pull/4260) - @fritzy
+  - @fritzy
+    - clarify they are not the author
+    - should be careful about what hooks we add as features
+    - WIP RFC
+6. **PR**: [#519 RFC: Package Distributions](https://github.com/npm/rfcs/pull/519) - @darcyclarke
+  - @darcyclarke
+    - no updates yet but seeing a lot of traction in the community
+  - @ruyadorno 
+    - are we going to open a diff PR for the "Expanding optional dependencies conditions"?
+    - this would mean it's easier/faster to get market validation
+  - **Actions:**
+    - [ ] @darcyclarke Schedule a working session to review Package Distributions & Optional Dependenyc Conditionals  
+7. **Issue**: [#438 [RRFC] Add libc fields to select optionalDependencies should be installed or skipped](https://github.com/npm/rfcs/issues/438) - @Brooooooklyn
+
+### Other Topics
+
+- @ljharb where are we with staged releases?
+- @bnb `npm audit license` work?