-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Biological Aging Clock in 2026 #110
Comments
If sponsorship as revenue works out, 2026 could also be the year of VO2Max. I could partner with the VO2Max leaderboard people (https://www.joinzero.co/leaderboard) which would increase the number of athletes, but more importantly people have access to VO2Max more than a blood test or epigenetic aging test. This would drive the cost down to literally zero assuming you have a fitness tracker that measures this. |
I kinda like how accessible blood based biomarkers are turning out, maybe we should choose the next one based on accessibility? Biological Aging Clocks Based on Traditional Blood Tests (Ranked Best to Worst)1. PhenoAge
2. GrimAge
3. Aging.AI
4. BloodAge
5. BioAge (Deep Longevity)
|
If you end up doing VO2Max, then you should convert that into biological age so you can show age reduction as that's kind of a staple of the entire endeavor. |
Another interesting idea: bioimpedance scale with a bioaging clock |
could go with trlomere length as well as measuring that is widely supported by many labs |
Use the following prompt for a bunch of AIs and see where that gets us:
|
After the first year, from 2026 the lab tests are gonna be at home test kits. It might be a good idea to choose an at home test kit where the seller is willing to offer LWC to whoever does the test not through LWC.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: