You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have now heard many times that Cognitive Atlas has insufficient coverage of clinical assessments (makes sense). It seems that SNOMED-CT has better coverage. Long term, we want to add a "clinical assessment" category and rename the current assessments to "cognitive assessment" - or something along those lines.
This issue is about an experimental, short term change that we will not publicly deploy. We want:
the options in the "Assessment tool" dropdown should come from SNOMED-CT, not Cognitive Atlas
the option names should be the preferred names from SNOMED-CT
the internally stored values when a user selects an assessment should be the SNOMED-CT unique identifiers (very much like we already do for diagnosis)
the values stored in the output data dictionary for "isAbout" should be SNOMED-CT unique identifiers (with snomed prefix)
The goal is not (necessarily) to make graph files with the data dictionaries, we may only use the data dictionaries to manually harmonize clinical assessments across a number of datasets to find out how many participants have these tools.
@rmanaem: this is the issue I mentioned to you yesterday.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For reviewer: check the app preview on the open draft PR to view the changes and discard the failing test cases as they're specific to terms from cogatlas.
We have now heard many times that Cognitive Atlas has insufficient coverage of clinical assessments (makes sense). It seems that SNOMED-CT has better coverage. Long term, we want to add a "clinical assessment" category and rename the current assessments to "cognitive assessment" - or something along those lines.
This issue is about an experimental, short term change that we will not publicly deploy. We want:
The goal is not (necessarily) to make graph files with the data dictionaries, we may only use the data dictionaries to manually harmonize clinical assessments across a number of datasets to find out how many participants have these tools.
@rmanaem: this is the issue I mentioned to you yesterday.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: