Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Examine TLV bounding #375

Closed
dccutrig opened this issue Dec 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Examine TLV bounding #375

dccutrig opened this issue Dec 17, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@dccutrig
Copy link
Contributor

Examine TLV bounding in Crypto_Process_Extended_Procedure_Pdu.

Need to ensure that TLV values in a packet are:

  1. Less than or equal to Max TLV Length (done, and fixed otherwise segfault - UTs exist) , and
  2. That TLV values make sense in the context of the length of both frames and space packets received

2 is a little more complicated and I can revisit

@dccutrig dccutrig self-assigned this Dec 17, 2024
dccutrig added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 18, 2024
… deactivating a bunch of keys. Tests are being worked pre-development
@dccutrig
Copy link
Contributor Author

Behold, an example of what mismatched lengths and corrupted values can currently do - and also the point of this issue:

image

@Donnie-Ice
Copy link
Contributor

Need to look deeper into sa_start

Donnie-Ice added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 11, 2025
Donnie-Ice added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 12, 2025
Donnie-Ice added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 18, 2025
Donnie-Ice added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 3, 2025
Donnie-Ice added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2025
Donnie-Ice added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2025
Donnie-Ice added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2025
Donnie-Ice added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2025
@Donnie-Ice Donnie-Ice moved this to In Progress in CryptoLib Path Forward Mar 13, 2025
dccutrig added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 18, 2025
dccutrig added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 18, 2025
dccutrig added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 20, 2025
dccutrig added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 20, 2025
dccutrig added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 24, 2025
dccutrig added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 24, 2025
dccutrig added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 24, 2025
Donnie-Ice added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 24, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in CryptoLib Path Forward Apr 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants