Add a bot to comment the LightHouse report for our convenience in each PR

[aakankshabhende]

Current Behavior

We currently don't have a LightHouse CI workflow which will check for Performance, Accessibility, Best practices, SEO, PWA for each PR and we manually need to go to the deployment and check it.

Desired Behavior

We should have a bot which will comment the LightHouse report for our convenience in each PR.

Workflow action: https://github.com/treosh/lighthouse-ci-action

[aakankshabhende]

@leecalcote @vishalvivekm Could you please share your opinion on this?
I would love to work on this!

[aakankshabhende]

As I'm working on improving the accessibility of the site, I believe having this bot will help us to maintain score for the future MRs.

[vishalvivekm]

@aakankshabhende let's discuss this in websites call.

[leecalcote]

@aakankshabhende, I think this is generally a positive thing, particularly when it comes to the Catalog pages. With this said, of the effort that we're going to incorporating lighthouse in this repo, there are a couple of higher priority areas in need of help where your efforts will be both better supported and more impactful.

1. The meshery.io/catalog offers no way to filter catalog content by content type: design pattern versus wasm filter versus meshery model. @vishalvivekm has been unable to implement this. Perhaps, you can.
2. The list of relationships in Meshery UI's Settings page is missing details that users need in order to find that UI helpful. I have sent details in Slack on this subject.

[leecalcote]

Related issue - #973

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[stale]

This issue is being automatically closed due to inactivity. However, you may choose to reopen this issue.