You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, if a container owns an object, then getting ownership out out (while destroying the container) is inconvenient; typically one would have an Empty state for the container so that one can first extract the owned object, and then separately discard the container. Maybe we could have destructive transactions that return tuples (we'd need to add support for these) and destroy the receiver.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, if a container owns an object, then getting ownership out out (while destroying the container) is inconvenient; typically one would have an Empty state for the container so that one can first extract the owned object, and then separately discard the container. Maybe we could have destructive transactions that return tuples (we'd need to add support for these) and destroy the receiver.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: