Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about guppy and medaka models #21

Open
rwilton1 opened this issue Dec 4, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Question about guppy and medaka models #21

rwilton1 opened this issue Dec 4, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@rwilton1
Copy link

rwilton1 commented Dec 4, 2023

Hello,

When I tried Circuitseq to basecall and assemble my plasmid data, I seemed to "lose" a lot of the data compared with when I basecalled and assembled my plasmid sequences independently. Also, the final plasmid consensus sequences had more errors than I got with my manual assembly pipeline. Although I'm using ONT barcodes, a quick glance at the sequencing_summary. txt file doesn't suggest the problem is due to barcode scoring.

I originally used the medaka model given in the downloaded run_nf_with_example_data.sh file: r1041_e82_400bps_hac_g615.
However, I reasoned that I should use the right medaka model for my data, and that might be part of my problem.

But, when I tried re-running the pipeline with a medaka model that matched my poretype (r941_min_sup_g615) it terminated with the following error (excerpt):

       Error executing process > 'MedakaConsensus (2)'

      Caused by:
        Process `MedakaConsensus (2)` terminated with an error exit status (1)
      
      Command executed:
      
        chmod -R a+rw ./
        medaka_consensus -i 03_filtered.fq.gz -d 03_chosen_assembly.fasta -o 03_racon_medaka -m r941_min_sup_g615 > file 2>&1
        chmod -R a+rw ./
       . . . . . . 

Is there another file that I need to update with the medaka model? Also, is there a way to confirm which version of guppy the pipeline is running?

Thank you!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant