You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
This bug might be related to issue #224.
When just setting up a domain "filled" with a grid, this could be unexpectedly difficult. See e.g. this example, where an "explosion" occurs in the first few simulation steps.
After having a closer look into this and coloring the particles depending on their temperature gives (Simstep = 1):
It seems like the particles at the edge are a bit hotter compared to the ones in the bulk. Furthermore, there are very hot (i.e. fast) particles in the corner.
I used MegaMol for the visualization and it should also consider the periodic boundary conditions when calculating the temperature. However, there could also be a bug in MegaMol.
This could be cross-checked with e.g. ParaView. However, it looks a bit better when using the old CubicGridGenerator (therefore, I guess that MegaMol is working correctly):
Observe the explosions and view the progress of the temperature during the simulation
Expected behavior
The equilibration of a liquid is very basic and should not lead to any explosions etc.
The state point of the exemplary simulation is more or less saturated liquid argon at a temperature of T=110K and a density of 31160 mol/m³. The saturated liquid density at T=110K is 31110 mol/m³.
This bug could also be an issue of reduced units or at least related to it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the bug
This bug might be related to issue #224.
When just setting up a domain "filled" with a grid, this could be unexpectedly difficult. See e.g. this example, where an "explosion" occurs in the first few simulation steps.
After having a closer look into this and coloring the particles depending on their temperature gives (Simstep = 1):
It seems like the particles at the edge are a bit hotter compared to the ones in the bulk. Furthermore, there are very hot (i.e. fast) particles in the corner.
I used MegaMol for the visualization and it should also consider the periodic boundary conditions when calculating the temperature. However, there could also be a bug in MegaMol.
This could be cross-checked with e.g. ParaView. However, it looks a bit better when using the old CubicGridGenerator (therefore, I guess that MegaMol is working correctly):
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
The equilibration of a liquid is very basic and should not lead to any explosions etc.
The state point of the exemplary simulation is more or less saturated liquid argon at a temperature of T=110K and a density of 31160 mol/m³. The saturated liquid density at T=110K is 31110 mol/m³.
This bug could also be an issue of reduced units or at least related to it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: